Larry Holmes vs Wladimir Klitschko

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by curly, Apr 26, 2009.


  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,854
    10,064
    Jul 15, 2008
    Holmes destroys him by stoppage between seven and nine rounds ..
     
  2. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,949
    Feb 21, 2009
    Larry Holmes would win, by late stoppage or decision...in my opinion.
     
  3. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    Larry was the better fighter although Vlad's size would make it interesting. Larry was so much better than Vlad I think he would still win by stoppage.
     
  4. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    75
    Nov 20, 2006
  5. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    Stylisitcally this is a bad fight for Larry. Like Larry Wlad's best weapon is his jab, only Wlad is bigger stronger and equally as quick with it. Unless Larry gets inside and makes a rough fight, I would favor Wlad. Yikes call me crazy, but I think Wlad wins a boxing match. :patsch
    I would love to pose a question like this to Emanuel.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    Agreed, Holmes is the better technician, faster, better athlete, more natural fighter. Wlad is too upright and uncomfortable on the inside to hang with Holmes. I can see it being close at the mid way point before Holmes pulls away and takes over before scoring a late stoppage
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Holmes' jab is superior, his chin is superior, as is his movement.

    Holmes, late stoppage over 15, wide PTS over 12.
     
  8. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    When was Holmes such a dynamic infighter? Not sure he is faster than Wlad either. Fighting tall and having a very effective jab, would be an advantage for Wlad against another fighter who fights similarly to him dont you think?
     
  9. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,275
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    Mid rounds stoppage for Holmes. Wlad's too upright, poor chin and has a tendency to panic when the going gets tough. Don't believe this would be particularly competitive.
     
  10. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,735
    15
    Apr 6, 2008

    i suspect anyone voting for holmes is

    A) needs to stop living in the past

    B) see A
     
  11. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,171
    16,945
    Jun 9, 2007
    Larry wins.He out jab's Klitschko then everything else falls into place.Larry had to much talant and skill for Klitschko.
     
  12. ticar

    ticar Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,264
    766
    Dec 7, 2008
    i think this is a good match for wlad.he beats holmes,ud decision,or even late tko...
    he is just bigger,stronger,and imo better skills...
    holmes wasnt a big puncher so wlad would use his big left hook..
    bad match up for wlad are agressive boxers with a big punch and constant pressure...
     
  13. Rourke

    Rourke Member Full Member

    208
    3
    Jun 2, 2009
    I can't see how Wlad could keep up the pace Larry had, even in a twelve round fight, I also can't see Wlad catching Larry with his punches because Larry is so much faster and to me Wlad looks flatfooted. I think Larry outpointing him is the more obvious choice but I voted for stoppage taking into factor that Wlad was born without a chin, also Wlad would be gassing later on where Larry could take him out... just my opinion.
     
  14. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,735
    15
    Apr 6, 2008
    the pace larry had?... i didn't know holmes was this frantic worker in the ring ...
     
  15. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,315
    299
    Jul 23, 2004
    Holmes via TKO.