Sports Network in administration?.......

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by brown bomber, Apr 30, 2009.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    They can mount a civil case or call for a public enquiry.

    Not knowing the full details it would be safe to assume that Warren has his ass pretty well covered.

    I would be surprised if he was actually a director of one of (or both) the firms..... could be wife, kids, member of his staff etc.
     
  2. PaddyD1983

    PaddyD1983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    2
    Dec 24, 2007
    Setanta should have been more careful in their initial drafting of the contracts me thinks.
     
  3. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    how is frank warren allowed onto bunce boxing hour if he, as has been alleged, screwed them over to go to sky?

    welcoming him on and making no reference to it? hyping the very fighters that were meant to box on setanta but are on sky
     
  4. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
    Hmm, just in case I'll delete everything I've just written.

    Tuffnutz, do me a favour mate, delete your post that quotes my post, I don't want Frank on my case :)
     
  5. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Because Warren hasn't himself done anything wrong.

    The company (Sports Network) MAY have - I do say may..... Warren only acts on behalf of the company..... even though it was probably Warren's decision.
     
  6. Tribute

    Tribute Guest

    At least this explains why Sports Network was replaced by Frank Warren Promotions at his events over the last few months.

    I've always thought he's a slimey ****, only my opinion of course!
     
  7. 1stcontact

    1stcontact Like Mo, But Better Full Member

    1,797
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    Well there maybe an upside to this:smoke

    Calzaghe wont be getting the money, so he may have to come out of retirement and take one last fight:yep and you know what that means... CARL FROCH

    Hmmm:think......this is fishy do you think this could be part of Carl Froch's master plan:nut
     
  8. HairyHighlander

    HairyHighlander BASS !! HOWLOWCANUGO ?? Full Member

    8,337
    1
    Nov 4, 2007

    :rofl :rofl :rofl

    QUALITY :D
     
  9. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    having done a law degree i can assure you that notions in popular culture about all these legal loopholes here there and everywhere are complete balls, the courts will in 9/10 cases side with common sense

    IF IF IF Warren is doing as has been suggested in this thread, and his defence is that he is not in charge of sports network and its them that owes joe the money and starts a new company, despite the fact that everyone knows that to be if not factually, then certainly practically untrue, warren doesnt have a hope.

    read the judgement in the case against joe. Warren picked and edited certain aspects to attempt to claim a moral victory however take the time to read the whole thing and see how scathing the judge was over certain aspects of warrens practises
     
  10. Chinny

    Chinny Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,611
    1
    Aug 10, 2007
    Good post. I read the entire judgement, it was very interesting but not surprising. The bit about lying about the Kessler purse to the gov bodies is out and out fraud. In my opinion!
     
  11. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    well man we can be warned to the hilt about discussing issues regarding frank warrens conduct and character, however we cant be told not to talk about a legal judgement!


    free speech!


    isnt it great to know that ESB members no longer have the same human rights as everyone else!?
     
  12. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    why are setanata ****ed what was the last warren fight they showed
     
  13. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    none mate, and there you have the crux of the issue regarding them!
     
  14. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    Fair play, Warren is a sneaky ****!
     
  15. davidjay

    davidjay Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,325
    925
    Feb 23, 2009
    If this is what it seems to be, Waren should have his licence revoked.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.