Marquez is the big winner ...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by fitzgeraldz, May 2, 2009.

  1. carias

    carias Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree, I was being sarcastic. Mayweather is a piece of ****. Now you'll see all his fanboys hang up on one phrase like they did with the "lineal champ" **** with baldomir. "p4p # 2" as if it negates the size difference...what a *****
     
  2. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,122
    Likes Received:
    13
    Carias - my bad. I thought you were being serious. I'm not a Floyd hater, but I'd really love to see JMM knock him the **** out. Won't happen. But I'd love to see it .
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    :lol: whatever man i have you pegged for what you are.
     
  4. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    and marquez had constipation with old casa and overhyped diaz while pac flushed david and hoya. :D

    you are mistaken with struggling and total domination. it is not pac's fault when he obliterated hoya and david. :yep
     
  5. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,063
    Likes Received:
    1
    You have me "pegged" cause I called you a sensitive *******, how very observant of you:lol:
     
  6. LastQuark

    LastQuark Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,928
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mayweather is a *****. Go down only 3 lbs and JMM is going up 9 lbs?

    It's unfair of course because Mayweather takes all the advantages as much as he can.
     
  7. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,863
    Likes Received:
    1
    yep. struggling for your wins definitely doesn't make them more credible. it just means that you fight at the level of your opposition who you are supposed to dominate especially being an Elite P4P fighter.
     
  8. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    0

    a lot of misguided posters here. they are faulting pac's domination and blaming his opponents such as shot, shell, paper champ when they are dominated which is a sorry delusional thinking to remove oneself from reality. they think that a fighter who struggled and came as a winner at the end in that fight is a more credible fight :lol::good
     
  9. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    3
    But Pac did not dominate Marquez, He struggled in both fights. Didn't he?
     
  10. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    3
    Also Marquez had problems with Barrera at one point.

    The point is Both have struggled at some point during their careers.
     
  11. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,063
    Likes Received:
    1
    Does seeking the comfort of like-minded posters really make you feel more
    validated:lol:
     
  12. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,863
    Likes Received:
    1
    we're talking about jmm's and pac's last 2 fights here. but pac wasn't supposed to dominate jmm. both of them are Elite P4P fighters and equally matched. jmm was supposed to dominate non-Elite level competition like old man casa and juan diaz but he didn't.
     
  13. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    3
    It doesn't matter. You are contradicting yourself. When you say that JMM struggled against Casa and JD, you are trying to imply that JMM is not that great, but then after you say
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  14. Leprikawn7

    Leprikawn7 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    794
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont see JMM as that easy..........though I think Floyd does.

    Floyd better be really sharp because this guy is smart and will make adjustments.
     
  15. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,863
    Likes Received:
    1
    i'm definitely not saying jmm is not great. what i'm saying is that jmm seems to fight at the level of his opposition for some reason. he performs great against great fighters but under-performs against lower-level opposition.