you must have forgot pseudoexpert... ATTN. SWEET PEA: do you still agree w/kg that pacman won't last 5 rounds with hatton??? Originally Posted by dangerousity This content is protected moral of teh story, stop acting like you know it all, because this proves you obviously dont. And so far, the *******s here who are deemed dumb and stupid, has been right more often than wrong...the only times they been proven wrong is in "fantasy" matchups. you are a pacteron who is bitter in his life . :rofl:rofl:rofl
i may have ranked benitez too low, but i feel ortiz ranked higher than benitez...thanks for the input on ortiz... pac>hoya and hatton at 140
Hatton's not in it, i thought this before his most recent loss and have voiced this opinion a few times. He ws on a platform to get in there when he beat Tszyu and already had Tackie on his ledger, the division was good then and he could have had a better go, but decided to for other **** like money fights with Floyd and Collazo at 147, also Castillo. Fights with Witter, even Gatti when he had a good run of form at the weight would have done more for his attempt to get in on this list. You gotta give him credit for going after Pac and Floyd i suppose, but it doesn't look good now (haha, harsh joke). And now with the one-sided demolition at the hands of Pacquiao, a fight that Hatton didn't make competitive at all, for me he simply doesn't rank above ten other men that have fared better in terms of greatness at light-welterweight. Pacquiao ia not in despite how amazing i believe he is, he has had one fight at 140 pounds.
I dont know man, it might be Hatton as crazy as it sounds, Hatton is not even on his level as an operator imo
dela hoya and benitez only have two significant fights at 140? is that enough to land them in the top 10?
Nar not delahoya, no business imo. You can take an opinion anhaving Ortiz in there if you like imo. And Benitez did fight there before winnig the title against Cervantes. Its all subjective, but Pac is a no no imo. Not bashing Pac, i luv the man