Making too much of Paquiao's KO of Hatton

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by conditioner101, May 4, 2009.


  1. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Exactly! People are just having a hard time wrapping their heads around PAC. Honestly he's done far more than I'd ever imagine.
     
  2. conditioner101

    conditioner101 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,538
    7
    Jul 13, 2007
    It was not an exceptional win. It was exceptional match making, and promoting. Urango hurt Hatton bad to the body, Colazzo had him out on his feet, Lazcano had him out on his feet, and Malinaggi even buzzed him once. There is no need to make anything up. What I am saying is can be plainly seen in those fights.
     
  3. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    You're ******ed. Saying just that is making you look weak. Who are you? The champions that you handled? GIve us some proof!

    Oscar was shot and weight drained. That's true! Don't forget the only reason that Oscar was still bigger and has the power advantage during that fight. They were both wearing 8oz gloves which means that Oscar has the power advantage since he is bigger. Oscar failed to use his height advantage. He fought small. He bent his back for no reason. He didn't throw his jab and move back. Even if Dela Hoya was not weight drained he would have suffered the same punishment.

    And I'll say this again. Pacquiao avenged his lost against Morales. TWICE! TKO in 11th and TKO in the 3rd round. His lost against Morales was not even one-sided! It was close!
    You say that Pacquiao hasn't proven himself that he is the best on the lower weight class. REAL Boxing experts thinks differently. Pacquio completely dominated the 122 division. He moved to 126 and kick the **** out of Barerra who was a pound for pound contender, and fought a trilogy with Morales with 2 wins (2KO) 1 lost. He has some wins against the BEST feather weight JMM(1win - 1 draw) Barerra (2Wins) and Morales (2 wins 1 lost). ALL THREE ARE FUTURE HALL OF FAMERS!

    Read my other post about Armstrong.
     
  4. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009

    LMAO!!! That really made me laugh! Yeep Hatton was really hurting! It was a close fight right? It's too bad Malignaggi's corner threw in the towel.
     
  5. dhralf

    dhralf **** the queen! Full Member

    4,950
    0
    Jan 25, 2007
    He's not invincible but c'mon he's the best right now, he lost a close UD vs Morales and his other losses are 10 and 13 years old..LOL...it dont take a lot of Willpower to understand this...
     
  6. Nestea

    Nestea Thirst Remover Full Member

    7,336
    0
    Feb 25, 2008
    Some people are just born stupid.
     
  7. dhralf

    dhralf **** the queen! Full Member

    4,950
    0
    Jan 25, 2007
    KO percentage....yeah...against very poor competition
     
  8. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Seriously, why dont you find another sport to watch...Instead of you giving props were its due...You come up with a bull**** excuse...Please Shut the hell up with this....Hatton just got beat by the better man...PERIOD!:verysad
     
  9. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    PAC going up from 106 to 140 and facing the KINGPIN of that division is nothing special?:lol: You must be Ray Robinson to dismiss such feats as the one that made history for PAC. This is boxing..."MATCHMAKING" is a neccessity of this sport in order for it to conitue on. "Hurt", "out on his feet".....yet he has only been down at the hands of 3 fighters. Dude.....you're logic is swiss cheeze brah. You are reaching and it's very evident by what you post. Having only one KO before the PAC fight doens't warrant a claim of "GLASS JAW". If it helps you accept makeing a wrong prediction then do you....but you only come off transparent. I see right through you.
     
  10. Sheikh

    Sheikh Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,981
    888
    Jun 4, 2007
    Agreed, Oscar and Hatton were handpicked. But Pac did beat them big, and he KO'd them, so he deserves credit for that. But too say he would beat Cotto, Floyd, Mosley, etc is stupid.
     
  11. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    I didn't even acknowledge that BS.....But I did laugh myself. Paulie hurt Ricky?:nut This guy is so see through it's ridicoulous!
     
  12. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    :deal
     
  13. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    "They" said the same thing when PAC was suppose to fight EM, MAB, JMM, DLH and Ricky. Go figure.
     
  14. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    if mab was stronger and had more gas in his tank
    if jmm knew how to avoid pac's powerful punches
    if hatton was more careful
    if dela hoya did not underestimate pac
    if david diaz is much faster
    if...

    if frazier ko'd ali
    if tyson beat holyfield


    the whole world of boxing changes if ,the "if" happens :lol:
     
  15. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    Hatton was not on the slide, He was SHOT! Pac fought him because he was SHOT! Are you happy now?