I would have been annoyed had it been given a draw but giving Pac the win was a disgrace, again imo. JMM deserved better.
That pales in comparison to John Stewart's scoring in their first match. 110-115 for Pac meant that even without the aid of that first round he had Manny winning that fightatsch
Watching Juan Manuel Marquez vs Manny Pacquiao II was an absolute pleasure. Lived up to the hype and more. Back and forth for 12 rounds.
Without a doubt the toughest round to score, 1st part was JMM"s and 2nd was Pacs after the cut. I really don't problem with people scoring by a round for JMM, it's people that scream robbery that gets me.
1 jmm 10-9 2 jmm 10-9 3 manny 10-8 4 even 5 jmm 10-9 6 manny 10-9 7 jmm 10-9 8 10-9 jmm (this is the round when jmm was outlanding manny 4punches to 1 and had him in trouble. could of been a 10-8 round with out the ko. it was that bad for manny) 9 manny 10-9 (manny back into fight, of course) 10 manny 10-9 11 jmm 10-9 (but then jmm answers back and takes crucial championship rounds) 12 jmm 10-9 Marquez 7 rounds to Pacquiao's 4 and 1 even close fight, but jmm clearly the winner. 3rd fight has to happen
Great post mate. I had pac winning by 1 point in a great fight. I hope the trilogy fight is made after mayweather beats both of them. Its great to see fighters of the calibre of mayweather, marquez & pac fighting each other. Only good for boxing.
Why do some of you insist on twisting things around or going off on different tangents to try and make your points valid. My post was clear enough:deal
I had it a draw last time I watched but one point up for either is no robbery. It was just a great and extremely close fight.