Froch is the LEGIT nr:1 Supermiddle

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mariancobretti, May 12, 2009.


  1. mariancobretti

    mariancobretti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,802
    0
    May 2, 2009
    ......

    the evidence is stacked in Forch's favour.:

    His win over Taylor is better and more high profile than any of the rival champs.

    Also to win the title over an excellent fighter like Pascal(ambitious unbeaten) is also better than anything Kessler and Bute have done in the last 24 months.


    Bute shouldnt even be a champion, the currupt ref let him survive against Andrade. that should tell you all about Bute. remember how limited a fighter Andrade is, I cant help imagine if Andrade could catch him what Froch would do with the straight right (the perfect punch for a southpaw)


    Kessler is content hiding behind an alpahbet agency making money of fickle fans and keeping his ESB cheerleader going.


    I think Froch will grow as champion with his title, he was obviously nervous before Taylor but went through the gears as he warmed to the task.


    Also credit to Froch....all the Calzaghe fans and Calzaghe himself were waiting for the big fall. Calzaghe gave Froch credit in the SUN about taking the Taylor fight, saying it was an acid test...

    Froch called his bluff and won....Calzaghe after the fight said Taylor had seen better years!!! ROFL...what a hipocrite....I gues Hopkins and jones, Eubank were all prime ...ROFL...


    Taylor was more prime than any of joes ex champs
     
  2. Davo-The-Don

    Davo-The-Don Big Swinging Thang Full Member

    798
    0
    Jun 13, 2008

    :good damn straight.
     
  3. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Pascal had fought nobody before he fought Froch. The only thing significant he did before that was he got himself hurt against an unheralded opponent Omar Pittman.

    If Froch had dominated Taylor from start to finish you might have a case, but he was less than 20 seconds away from losing the fight by a clear decision.
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    Nah. Before the fight I had Taylor at #4 and Froch at #5. Now its Froch at #4, and Taylor at #5. Froch was after all like 10 seconds away from losing the fight.
     
  5. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Is Taylor really better than Andrade at 168? Because he's proved ****-all at the weight.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    Andrade would spark Taylor out. And it would take less than 12 rounds.
     
  7. mariancobretti

    mariancobretti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,802
    0
    May 2, 2009

    lol...wtf has Andrade proved???he can be a human punch bag for 23 rounds???lol and then take advantage of **** conditioning.

    Taylor has wins over Hopkins, Lacy .....weight means ****....he was the NAME in the division.

    and can you see Kessler+ Bute fighting in the US....Bute would if he had that ref again...rofl
     
  8. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Nah,he's no 3 at best.
     
  9. mariancobretti

    mariancobretti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,802
    0
    May 2, 2009
    tell me who Andrade has beat??? lol

    you comedians try to build him up because Kessler and Bute have faced him...

    but hes got no credibilty at all...who has he beaten????
    please tell me???

    Taylors cred cant be disputed...its a far better WIN than any of those to Robbers have got.

    Also to fight an established champion like Taylor in

    your 1st defense in his backyard!! is amazing tribute to Frochs mental strength, knowing that you enter a ring knowing if its a close fight you wont get the decision like fighters with a big following will get (Calzaghe Hatton).

    No crowd reaction to your punches.
     
  10. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Kessler's loss to Calzaghe was better than any of Froch's victories.
     
  11. Baby Bull

    Baby Bull Active Member Full Member

    664
    0
    Mar 2, 2009
    Taylor hasent esablished at that weight (1-1 with win over Lacy and loss to Pavlik). Bute is with wins over the best challengers.
     
  12. mariancobretti

    mariancobretti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,802
    0
    May 2, 2009
    I guess robin Reid is better than froch then? Tucker Pudwill.

    Kessler fight was only big because he brough the belts to the table.


    The fact that Kessler was the number 2 super middle at the time should tell u how weak a division it was.

    lol


    a far cry from

    Benn, Mccllelan, Jones, Eubank, toney, nunn, Macullum, Collin era.

    kessler would barely make the top 10 ROFL
     
  13. mariancobretti

    mariancobretti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,802
    0
    May 2, 2009

    William joppy?

    a dodgy win over a mexican roadsweeper Andrade??

    Rofl

    drugs are bad for u son
     
  14. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    Andrade his a better version of Froch! he his better in every domain exept power and conter punch .
     
  15. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    You really have to stretch to make your point by distorting what I said. Try again. You are expanding what I said to things that I didn't say or even come close to implying.