Read the latest moronic statement about Wlad and tell me.....

How much worse can this Klitschko thing get?? :-(

 

Superfuzz is a proven ****** already. Just more evidence to support it.

Could Klitschko fans be even dumber than *******s?

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Lennox would smash Wvlad, but you have to admit he ran like a ***** from Vitali with his tail between his legs. He'll always be remembered as a ****in' loser for that. :yep

 

Lennox Lewis:

This content is protected

The worlds most dangerous runner apparently.atsch

 

Klit-Lickers are perhaps the worst, but I think a lot of the comments aren't even serious anyway. Just meant to get a rise out of people.

 

Is he really talking about the same guy that took 11 rounds to beat Tony Thompson?

 

I am a Wlad fan and can't see for the life of me that Wlad fans are any worse than the Wlad haters that claim he would lose to any good fighter in history. Lennox, because of his combination of size, athleticism and power, would be one of the few fighters with excellent chances against Wlad, still on his best night Wlad could pull it off as well. Wlad ain't no Michael Grant.

What Wlad haters keep doing is just as moronic as the above statement; brinign up his losses as if they summarize Wlad as a fighter and deducting his chances for any upcoming bout or fantasy matchup purely from his losses. Wlad is an interesting case, on his worst nights he lost to B level fighters, but on top of his game, he is no pushover for anyone.

 

Well, it's actually fight/weakness analysis, which is better than most people give. Granted, it's seriously flawed analysis, but how about people give a counter argument instead of laughing at it because it doesn't agree with you?

 

Hmm .. sometimes your life changes depending upon the circumstances you encounter. If Wlad had met a prime Lewis and gotten the Michael Grant treatment who is to say what would have occurred? In 2002-2003, Lewis KOs Wlad in 4. Wlad rebuilds with a few stiffs like a Moli and then runs into Sanders who blitzes him in 2. Then he fights more stiffs until he comes up short with Brewster with his drug-soaked Grants (or whatever he was using) and gets stopped in 5. Then a couple more rebuilding fights and this time the skull rattling rabbit punches by Peter puts his lights out in the tenth. Who can say?

He should send Lennox a gift every Christmas for avoiding him and leaving him his career.

 

You mean the same Lennox Lewis who couldn't knock out Levi Billups in a 10 round fight?

Not dissing Lewis, just making a point.. you're a ****head.

(P.S the 6'6" previously undefeated southpaw Tony Thompson? yeah him.)

 

Much dumber! At least Pac is actually a good fighter. Vitaly is ok, no more than that. Wlad is very poor however.

 

The following in bold is not fight/weakness analysis:

I can prove that Wlad would Ko Lennox if they had ever fought, even the pre-Steward Wlad. Watch Lennox versus Shannon Briggs. Watch the first round. When Lennox tries to attack Briggs, a quick left hook from briggs hurts Lennox. Lennox was lucky to survive that first round. Now, credit to Lennox for surviving and then KO'ing Briggs big time later in the 4th, I think. You see though, Lennox is vulnerable to a good left hook. Always has, always will.

Maybe that is also the reason why he never fought a southpaw either. Maybe, Lennox isn't smart enough to handle anything other than orthodox fighters, you know "he needs it to be kept as simple as possible."

I would have made a big wager if they ever had fought, that Wlad catches him with a good left hook, and then Wlad finished him off with a huge right, early too. Too bad they never fought. Lennox could have fought Wlad too, he had that WBO belt, but for some reason, Lennox never wanted to fight Wlad. I wonder why?

You see my problem with this?

 

Just tragic...

 

You've got to be joking!