Roach tells Arum screw Cotto!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buckdacious, May 15, 2009.


  1. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Here's a question - is Mayweather still lineal champ at 147? I personally don't think so, but I can see an argument that he is. If he never officially retired, he'd still be lineal champ, but I think he lost it when he retired. Otherwise, we could also say that Vitali Klitschko is lineal champ, I guess. As I see it, there is no "the man" at 147.
     
  2. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Pac's next fight should be one of these three: Mayweather, Cotto, Mosley. Maybe Mayweather can, but Roach said Pac will fight the winner of that fight next year....but what the hell does Freddie know right? :yep And no, I'm not too interested in Mosley vs Cotto II
     
  3. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    Well no ****.

    but i dont think asking us why Cotto doesn't do that will matter, because none of us are Miguel Cotto.
     
  4. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    I don't give a fug what Roach says. I still want to see Pac-Cotto. That would be WW III.
     
  5. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    It's way better for Cotto's wallet to fight Pacquiao than Mosley. Telling a modern boxer to think about their legacy instead of their bankroll is like telling a guy to think with his head and not with his dick - it ain't gonna happen.
     
  6. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    Roach knows what the people want to see.
     
  7. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    I think he lost it after he left the division to fight Oscar and then fought Hatton.

    I wouldn't even rate Mayweather in the top 5 WW rankings right now. He abandoned that class.
     
  8. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    Why are you not intrsted in a Cotto-Mosley II????:patsch
     
  9. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    It's just a personal opinion, thats all. I'd rather see other fights.
     
  10. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    Roach said there fighting the winner of Mayweather-Marquez this year. not next year, thats what Arum was saying but Roach pimp slapped him
     
  11. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    Yes, but not at 143 or 144. I believe Cotto is going to have trouble making 147 soon. Three pounds is a lot believe it or not. It is either 147 or forget it. Mosley is the only one that will risk coming down to that weight so he can make the money and shine like he use to if he wins.
     
  12. KayEpps

    KayEpps Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,693
    1
    Jul 25, 2007
    They're going after the money - and why not!!!!!
     
  13. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    LIke what? just asking, you dont have to get defnsive. but for me the WW division is the best weight class or at least top 3, and we still dont have a lineal champ. I need to see whos the man, thats why I want to see Cotto-Mosley II to settle it, or if Clottey wins then Mosley-Clottey would be great too.
     
  14. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    since when does the "trainer" negotiate business deals and tell other promoters to F off?
     
  15. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    :lol::lol::lol: Are you serious?

    Weren't you just hating on Mayweather for fighting Marquez but you want to see Cotto-Pac?

    ****ing hypocrite.