Even for the General Forum some of the posts in this thread have been beyond ******ed. Pac doesn't beat many genuine ATGs beyond 140 lbs. That's not a slight to Pac, who is a great fighter, it's to do with size. Duran would firmly hand Pac his arse.
I agree with you. This is getting ridiculous. Next thing we're going to hear is, "Who would win? Pac vs Pac."
sorry, i'm late on this one hadn't seen it. I won't bash newbies for being newbies, we all were once. I will bash you for being ****ing stupid and not knowing **** about boxing. :tired
K, enough of the angry rant. In all seriousness, Pac is approaching my top 25 all time. He's a near perfect fighter and despite some small flaws, is a dynamo. Duran, at lightweight, was a perfect fighter. Top 5 easy all time P4P. Even at 147 he was, at his peak, beyond magnificent. At 140 they would both be at or very near their peaks. Duran had speed, defense, a deep wealth of power, courage and one of the most packed arsenals of punches ever. Pac has equal speed, great power, weaker defense and a very full offense. This is not an easy fight for either but Duran at his best was a match for anyone, ever. He wears Pac down, grinding down over the late rounds for a TKO or close decision. I don't see this going anywhere near like Hearns-Duran as 1)Hearns is a physical freak 2) Duran was not at his best. Not an excuse but that wasn't Hands of Stone
Actually these type of threads have been posted ever since pac beat morales for time....it got to a point where as a joke non-*******s would start threads with names like "Pac vs. Grizzly Bear" and such. Frankly the only thing that I'm suprised about is that there aren't more of them now that there's a ligitament agruement for him being able to hang with these guys.
You may have the benefit of veiwing a Duran or Leonard fight at present which I ain't got but I had viewed the live fight and in my opinion I think Pac would have fared favorably against any of those two basing on that first fight alone...