Pacman's resume ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by trampie, May 16, 2009.


Page 1 of 8
  1. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    Pacquiao 16th fight was against Gala who had only ever won one fight. infact going into the Pacquiao fight he had lost 9 in a row.

    Fight number 17 for Pacquiao was against Sung-Yul Lee who had fought twice and lost twice.

    Pacquiao continued to fight average opposition before getting a WBC title shot which he won he then lost the title trying to defend it for the second time, he then goes on a run of winning the WBC international super bantemweight title six times in a row, I believe this is a stepping stone title for boxers outside the top 10.

    In total I believe Pacman has fought 15 times for stepping stone titles ?

    Pacquiao has 3 losses and 2 draws on his record.

    Pacmans last 5 bouts have been against boxers who were all over 30 years of age, some of them 'shot' eg DLH.

    I would be the first to admit that holes can be picked in most boxers resume's, as good as Pacquiao is, is he really a top 50 ATG or even a top 20 ATG as some people are suggesting, considering he is a modern boxer, 3 losses and 2 draws is not great, Pacman resume is also good but not great.

    I dont think he is top 50 ATG material at the moment {that can change if he keeps on winning}
     
    trampie, May 16, 2009
    trampie, May 16, 2009
    #1
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Titles in 6 different divisions,lineal in 4 of them.
    Fought from 106 to 147.
    2 of the 3 losses came when he was a boy.
    DLH wasn't shot,he was dead at the weight.
     
    catasyou, May 16, 2009
    catasyou, May 16, 2009
    #2
  3. o_money

    o_money Boxing Junkie banned

    11,894
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    I think people put far too much emphasis on loses and draws. You have to look at when these loses happened and how young/under developed he was when he first started boxing. I'm not sure what you mean by as a 'modern boxer" but he sure as **** wasn't a "modern boxer" when he fist started fighting.
     
    o_money, May 16, 2009
    o_money, May 16, 2009
    #3
  4. Blue145

    Blue145 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,060
    1
    Sep 3, 2008
    People always put he fought at 106 as an advantage to his greatness... so why not put the losses that came around then? can't have it both ways.
     
    Blue145, May 16, 2009
    Blue145, May 16, 2009
    #4
  5. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Alas, someone who has kept it real lol...
     
    NALLEGE, May 16, 2009
    NALLEGE, May 16, 2009
    #5
  6. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005

    Yes you can. The fact that he won a world lineal championship at age 19 and very inexperienced is a testament to his greatness...doesn't take away the fact though that he was nowhere near his prime. No one is saying he was the best at that weight anyways, just that he was good enough to win a championship far far from his prime.
     
    dangerousity, May 16, 2009
    dangerousity, May 16, 2009
    #6
  7. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Liston was past it. Patterson was too small and past it. Frazier was past 30. Foreman was green. Ali sucks and isnt deserving of top 50 ATG.

    Idiots. You can do this with any resume...doesnt take a genius.
     
    dangerousity, May 16, 2009
    dangerousity, May 16, 2009
    #7
  8. splasher25

    splasher25 Active Member Full Member

    1,024
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    Just a hater.
    Fair enough if u don't like a fighter, but his is plain hating. :-(
     
    splasher25, May 16, 2009
    splasher25, May 16, 2009
    #8
  9. Mr. Blobby

    Mr. Blobby Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,136
    0
    Feb 28, 2009
    hahaha another failed thread by the noob trampie

    :tong
     
    Mr. Blobby, May 16, 2009
    Mr. Blobby, May 16, 2009
    #9
  10. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    Very good point.:think
     
    Kush, May 16, 2009
    Kush, May 16, 2009
    #10
  11. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008


    Makes for a very welcome change from the continuous ball licking

    Pac's great, no doubt. But it's true - most of his big wins have came against shot fighters
     
    radab, May 16, 2009
    radab, May 16, 2009
    #11
  12. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    agree!

    winning 3 titles form 3 division in his pre-prime stage is a testament to his greatness...

    in fact, there is no flyweight/bantamweight champ that had success past 126(just goes to show how hard if not impossible)...pacquiao doesn't have only good run past 126 but a legendary career at that; and to some, what he did from 108-147 is iconic
     
    asero, May 16, 2009
    asero, May 16, 2009
    #12
  13. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008


    so says the 2 month old virgin with 438 posts :patsch
     
    radab, May 16, 2009
    radab, May 16, 2009
    #13
  14. Mr. Blobby

    Mr. Blobby Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,136
    0
    Feb 28, 2009
    i knew someone would bite hahahaha :lol:
     
    Mr. Blobby, May 16, 2009
    Mr. Blobby, May 16, 2009
    #14
  15. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    No, this can't be done to anyone lol,...especially a fighter like Ali lol...
     
    NALLEGE, May 16, 2009
    NALLEGE, May 16, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 8