If Floyd beats Marquez, PAc has no choice but to fight Floyd, or be ridiculed by me.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NALLEGE, May 17, 2009.


  1. blank

    blank Active Member Full Member

    588
    3
    Dec 4, 2007
    So you'll ridicule Pac if he doesn't fight Floyd, but Floyd won't catch any flack from you for not taking on legit challenges like Mosley or Cotto? I guess we've heard it directly from the president of Floyd's fan club, the man is safe from any kind of critique when it comes to ducking dudes his own size, but if a guy Floyd himself has said is too small for him doesn't man up and take the fight, he deserves to be ridiculed!!!


    Hypocrisy rocks, dude!!!!
     
  2. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Pac has not beaten a good black fighter and this can't be said any clearer. Since rising to 126 and up, he has not faced a skilled black fighter in 17 fights(2002). Second, this 50-50 thing is kind of comical to read because even if PAc makes less than floyd, he is a multi millionaire if he takes 55-45 or anything near that.
     
  3. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    NALLEGE you realise you want/expect Pacquaio as #1 to do everything Mayweather did not.

    I don't blame Arum/Roach if they do not give PBF the fight.
    & not out of any type of fear for Mayweather or losing, but just because.
     
  4. nhojrem

    nhojrem Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,436
    0
    Jan 4, 2009
  5. blank

    blank Active Member Full Member

    588
    3
    Dec 4, 2007

    Exactly, well said.
     
  6. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Why should Floyd be criticized for not fighting any of the ww's? He can still do that. He rose to ww and won the undisputed ww title before those guys. He rose in weight and won those ww titles. Sure Baldy was stripped for no real reason, but those guys didn't get in line to become a mandatory to fight Floyd, they took those stripped titles, and asked Floyd for a fight. They didn't deserve title shots unless they fought Floyd. Floyd could've been forced to defend his titles against those guys. He was the true unified ww champ before he retired. Those other guys took those vacated/stripped belts from Baldy and called themselves champs. Floyd beat the champ.
     
  7. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    I'm not important. I ride with fighters always. Don't make this out to be about me. i'm going to ridicule PAc if he doesn't fight Floyd if Floyd beats Marquez. No PAc fan will be safe when talking about how great PAc is.
     
  8. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,301
    15,149
    Dec 6, 2008
    Woah I guess Pac really needs to fight Floyd now :lol:.
     
  9. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    He lost nothing when he retired, he's not the first to retire you know. Pacquiao just got some serious wins over DLH and Hatton when Mayweather retired and the ONLY reason people mention Floyd a lot is because DLH and Hatton were Floyd's last two opponents.
     
  10. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    134
    Jul 20, 2004
    This content is protected
     
  11. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    You won't blame them for not giving him the fight?, why exactly?

    Because Mayweather isn't "worth" it? :lol:, says who?, the entire boxing public wants this fight because it is the fight that makes sense and the biggest of this generation. Just incase you forgot, Mayweather was P4P#1 when he retired, yes the same position Pac got and secured. What Pac is doing recently doesn't erase everything Mayweather has done, some of you guys need to wake the **** up and take a look at what Mayweather has done his entire career. If you guys started watching boxing in 2006 Mayweather's career didn't start with you.
     
  12. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Still ******s bringing up Mosley and Cotto as "legitimate" threats, only a ****** would consider those two legitimate threats ESPECIALLY Cotto who just came off a brutal TKO loss to none other than the most terrible overhyped fighter of this generation in Margarito.

    Mosley was called out for a fight in 2006 and in February THIS YEAR and turned BOTH down. Might want to check on news you're mising and avoind making a fool out of yourself.

    I'll be waiting to see you use Clottey and Berto instead. :lol:

    There is only one legitimate threat and that's Pacquiao. Those "true" Welterweights you're talking about have unfinished business with one another.
     
  13. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    There isn't anything Floyd hasn't done. Second, when a fan says that they don't care whether Arum or Roach gives Floyd the fight, I find that kind of disturbing, and we have nothing to talk about.
     
  14. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    :bart Who said anything about erasing Floyds past?

    I know Mayweather WAS considered P4P #1, never implied anything to say different.

    I say he lost his cards because he gave up his spot #1 when he alked away... (Even you admit Pacquaio now has this spot)

    Was Floyd as the #1 easy to negotiate with?
    Why should Pacquaio be any different, Is it because you know one is a warrior & the other is only out to line his pockets?
     
  15. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Weren't you the clown who called my avy ugly lol...and your buddy Blade was rolling around on the floor laughing with you lol...:nut