Can Arthur Abraham KTFO Kelly Pavlik with One Punch?

I said he was hurt. not hurt to the point he was gonna go down, but he got shook up by a 44 old Hopkins. a Prime Abrhama will KO Pavilk nasty. I think it will be one of those KO's that PPL just cant recover from.

 

You dumb ass, you just finally proved my point and yet you don't even see it. I'd say that is game, set, match to Hermit. :deal

 

READ THE WHOLE PARAGRAPH! Calling me a dumbass, you are basically saying how HE CAN NOT, and HOW PAVLIK TOOK MIRANDAS Punches better. What does "very unlikely", you highlited part have to do with the poll and question. There is a lot before and after "very unlikely" that you simply left out. Oh my God why am I even wasting my time. atsch

 

So he was hurt, but not down, from a guy 2 weight classes heavier who does indeed have pop. This somehow proves that Arthur Abraham, who has never really knocked out a fighter with a proven chin and recovery powers like Pavlik would starch him in one shot? Please. Use your head.

 

That guy has fought at 160 majority of his life, and he does not have "pop". He is a technician who was supposed to be run over by pavlik. And your point I don't get.:huh

 

You're ignorant of Hopkins if you think he doesn't have pop. That's all.

 

Hops has sneaky pop. He doesn't load up often, but his power is there when he choses to use it.

 

Because you are trying to pretend your ass wasn't just owned. Trying to change what you said earlier will not help. I have asked you what, 4 or 5 times now to show me where I said what is highlighted in red and you can't because it NEVER happend. You ran off to make some poll to show how stupid I was as if votes would translate to reality. You lost fair and square but you just can't accept that. Go ahead, make up some more ****, try and change the topic again. Ain't gonna help. You were just EXPOSED big time. Own up.

 

Internet fights are for losers, you both got owned.

 

Owned, what are we in the fifth grade. Explain "very unlikely"? I will be waiting, what does "very unlikely" that you wrote connote to?

 

After the occasional head butt yeah he does.

 

Oh that rally hurts. I lay down the facts and that makes ME a loser. OK.....

Internet self righteousness is for losers. You just owned yourself.

 

It's not even worth discussing things with you. Go watch some of Hopkins' fights and then we can discuss.

 

It does NOT mean NEVER like you claimed I said. That is all I need to say isn't it? But why should I have to answer any of your questions when you have ignored my request, I've lost how many times now, to show me where I said NEVER. I know English is not your first language you I have to believe you know the difference between something being unlikely to happen and NEVER happening? No?

 

Yeah. He started out trying to disprove a point I never made and it has gone downhill from there.