Ali-Holmes outcome without thyolar

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by tommy the hat, May 22, 2009.


  1. tommy the hat

    tommy the hat Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    9
    Sep 2, 2008
    If Ali didn't mess his body up with thyolar before he fought Larry Holmes, would the outcome have been different?
     
  2. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Ali was indeed too light at 218 pounds for Holmes (211) in 1980............. BUT! NO!! It wouldn't have mattered had Ali weighed a better 224 pounds.... Ali was ill with Parkinson's disease as early as 1978..... It was not proven until 1984, but that doesn't matter....... Ali was in ill health by 1980, and his passing of the physical exam was ****ing shameful by Las Vegas......... Ali had poor balance and slurred speech by '80......... Christ, even Ray Charles saw that.............. Peace.........

    MR.BILL:deal:admin
     
  3. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Holmes beats the hell out of any 1980 version of Ali.
     
  4. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    I tend to agree with what you say, but i do think the fight would have been a little more competitive and Ali might have even lasted the distance. Ali didnt look that bad against Berbick (although obviously he was nothing compared to his prime). I have heard reports that Ali was showing signs of Parkinsons even earlier than 1978, when he would sit in the gym.
     
  5. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Sad....but the head is not designed to take massive blows from Foreman, Frazier, Norton, & Shavers over & over.
     
  6. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,047
    Apr 1, 2007
    Wouldn't have mattered if he was tweaking his thyroid to lose weight or not, Holmes wasn't going to lose to that Ali, and I'm imagining he'd be damned if he wouldn't fight like he was possessed by the devil against any Ali.
     
  7. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Nar, no difference
     
  8. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Larry Holmes was PEAKED in '80....................... The '80 Holmes would've *****-slapped the '88 Mike Tyson like a girl, in a time machine.......... What a difference 8 yrs can make in sports............. Cheerio...

    MR.BILL
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,748
    44,299
    Apr 27, 2005
    Holmes may have beaten Tyson but lets not kid ourselves that it would not have been dangerous and competitive.
     
  10. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,032
    Sep 5, 2004
    I tend to think the '88 Tyson would have beaten any version of Holmes.

    There's only two fighters who I think at thier best would have been a 50/50 chance with Tyson;

    Muhammad Ali and (reluctantly) Lennox Lewis.
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Holmes wins easy with or without Thyloar. The truth is Ali worked hard to get into shape for the Holmes match. It did not matter. He was too old and too slow for this match, and Holmes was too good and too young.

    I think Holmes could have beaten Ali as early as 1977, but that is a different thread.
     
  12. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    I doubt that. I don't see Holmes ever easily beating Mike Tyson.
     
  13. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    498
    Jan 28, 2007
    I don't see anyone ever easily beating the Mike Tyson of 1988.
     
  14. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Okay, Okay.... Perhaps not so easily, but Holmes of '80 schools Tyson of '88 in a Time Machine.......... Holmes was too fast and savy with his movement and pumping jab....:yep

    SR.BILL:bbb:rasta
     
  15. godking

    godking Active Member Full Member

    1,140
    9
    Aug 21, 2006
    Holmes was not faster then Tyson and moving and jabbing was not the best tactic against Tyson guys who moved and jabbed gave him momentum guys who punched and then clinched frustated Tyson and stopped him from landing (Douglas Holyfield in Tyson vs Holyfield 1)

    Best Tyson vs best Holmes 50-50 fight.