Why do certain guys ALWAYS bring up COTTO's loss to Margarito time after time?.......

I don't have to proivide evidence that Margarito is innocent of using loaded gloves against Cotto. Are you having trouble comprehending the concept of the onus of guilt being the prosecutions responsibility to prove?

But, where is the link to back up your claims?

Both of them this time - the claim that Margo used loaded gloves against Cotto, and also the blood test results from the PBF Hatton fight.

Hop to it dungbeetle, start backing your words up instead of wasting people's time.

 

Oh, it was a picture of something, not just a red X?

 

I love when people say "even if Margarito had loaded gloves, cotto was blah blah". Who cares? The guy was getting hit by LOADED GLOVES, who cares if Cotto wasn't fighting the way he should have been fighting according to you. It could have been different. Acting like the loaded gloves was irrelevant doesn't make sense.

Not saying that Margarito had plaster in that fight.

 

If Cotto fights smart he beats Margarito easy whether he had loaded gloves or not. How is that not relevant?

 

If you need me to provide evidence of them doing tests after fights for you then you will also need me to give you a boxing lecture, as I said the likes of you belong in the lounge not in boxing related topics as we know you registered here to view photos of guys in the lounge and comment on them.

You're not even answering a single question I'm leaving you, DO YOU HAVE ANY PROOF THAT MARGARITO DIDN'T LOAD UP HIS GLOVES?

I'll wait for a personal attack response now.

 

Oh really?

I didn't see any of Cotto's biggest shots having any effect on Margo.

Apart from running more, what can Cotto do to 'fight smarter'?

 

Is that an indirect request for online donation to get a better connection? :rofl

 

Ah look, I'm obviously dealing with someone who suffers severe tunnel vision here, so forget about my 'Floyd steroids' analogy, as you're having more than enough trouble with the main topic.

I don't need proof because Margarito is innocent until proven guilty. He was not found guilty of using loaded gloves against Cotto.

You have stated that he did use loaded gloves against Cotto. Where is your evidence to prove that statement?

 

I gather it was something pornographic in nature and thus was blocked by my firewall.

Look at you, accusing others of not sticking to boxing-related topics, yet there you are posting links to pornography.

You sick little feces-eating coprophile :yep

 

No, we won't drop the Mayweather/Hatton topic. You tried to bring that as an example and ended up looking like an idiot. Now tell me again, don't you believe/know by now that they do tests after EACH fight and it's only usually reported when they do find something or teams are suspicious?

About Margarito/Cotto, as I said, please prove to me that he didn't use plastic of paris. You are obviously charging in this thread like the keyboard gladiator that you are trying to hint that Margarito didn't, can you prove that he didn't before asking me to prove that he did?

It's obvious that the HBO team and MANY other fans immediately remembered the Cotto fight after he was exposed against Mosley so I'm not the only one to assume he did that. Even in court it was mentioned that the risk of him using it in previous fights is DEFINITELY being looked into which is a HUGE reason behind his banishment.

Answers please. Allow me to give you a preview of what your response will be. "****ing jackass idiot loser ass hole proof now pleeez proof lolz pwned lolz proof? proof much? lools no proof? noob ******* pissrace assmunch cameljock lolz i win".

 

You just demonstrated that you don't know anything about boxing!:hi:

 

To someone like you I'm not surprised at all that this is pornographic.

This content is protected

Prepare to masturbate in full force. After the keyboard outrage you might want to take those hands where they belong to clear your head and return with vicious responses and online knockouts.

 

Just look at his responses, this guy is a clown. I haven't had a SINGLE response boxing related, it's all pornographic related or personal outbursts like a group of women on their periods all in one fat sexually frustrated loser.

 

I want you to provide evidence of Floyd's clean blood test after the Hatton fight, otherwise, he is guilty of using steroids. Can you do that? I didn't think so, therefore, you cannot provide proof that Floyd was not using steroids when he fought Hatton.

Sound familiar? I had to lower my standards for a few minutes to be able to descend to your depths of stupidity, but now that I've spelt it out for you, surely you can't claim lack of comprehension.

Now you're claiming Margo used STEROIDS against Cotto?

I'd like you to verify your first claim if him using loaded gloves before you go making more wild accusations :yep

At the end of the day, once all the bells have stopped ringing and the whistles stopped blowing, you still cannot provide any proof of your claim that Margarito used loaded gloves against Cotto, can you dungbeetle? :hey

 

Actually, I asked you a question that you chose not to answer :hey

Your lack of an answer would suggest it is you who knows little or nothing about boxing :yep