Why do certain guys ALWAYS bring up COTTO's loss to Margarito time after time?.......

Boxing-related? :think

Go

This content is protected

and

This content is protected

and BLOW YOURSELF UP

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

and

This content is protected

 

Like you can prove any evidence either. All you come up with is a pathetic personal attack with "Proof much lols?!?!?!" in the end. I'm not here to educate you really and even if I try I won't be able as I can't go that low to send my message to a keyboard assassin.

Obviously your answer is NO you have no proof that he didn't so lounge time, I'm sure a few new male members added pictures, rush now before the bandwidth hits the limit and you end up sexually frustrated again.

 

Says the guy who went to the effort of posting an non-boxing realted image on imageshack so it wouldn't be blocked by my firewall

You're the one who can't keep it on topic - I've asked you many times to provide evidence of your claim that Margo used loaded gloves against Cotto, and you've provided zilch, other than dumb pictures that are totally unrelated to the topic.

hypocrite dungbeetle :yep

 

I see you're taking notes for future keyboard sword fights, good for you, I'm glad I'm helping at least.

 

This is how you began contributing to this thread.

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Well, it's taken you multiple pages over 2 threads to finally admit you have no evidence backing up your claim that Margo used loaded gloves against Cotto.

Don't you feel better now for having been honest?

That's all I wanted, some honesty on your part since you LIE so much - you only have yourself to blame for dragging it out for so long. Amazing the junk you've posted while being so reluctant to admit you've got no proof huh?

You know what they say little dungbeetle: Tell the truth and shame the devil :yep

 

So you admit you're an internet sword fighter?

I would have picked you to be a sword fighter of the pork variety, dungbeetle :yep

 

Yep, in response to this totally unsubstantiated claim by you on page 1...we're now on page 5 and you have only just admitted that you have no proof to back up your claim :think

 

Sure, keep telling yourself "I WON THE KEYBOARD WAR I WON THE KEYBOARD WAR".

I asked you a question and I'm not going to answer your question till you answer mine. Actually I had TWO questions.

You brought up the Hatton/Mayweather fight as an example to prove if Mayweather didn't use steroids in that one. My answer was full of proof and I left you a question in the end to expose your **** poor boxing knowledge. You don't know already that tests happen after EVERY boxing fight and it's only announced when it's negative?

Second question, prove that Margarito DIDN'T use pastic of paris against Cotto.

Don't expect to get answers when you fail to answer yourself.

 

Back to the "proof pleeez" nonsense again. Loving how pathetic you're looking here. :rofl

 

Funny how you respond under one second when it's spam and junk related. And I was stupid enough to assume you take notes, you're probably sitting there in the caravan you live in laid back expecting all of us taking notes and kneeling down as you pwn your way to gladiator status.

 

And you reckon I'm trying to win a keyboard war

I tire of you, dungbeetle - you've had 5 pages to answer my question - which I asked well before you asked any questions of me - and you still haven't answered it.

I believe I've made my point :yep

Besides, I believe the correct terminology for a failed blood test is 'positive' not 'negative'. My question wasn't asking you to prove there is such a post-fight procedure in place (although that is what you've seized on), it was prove that Floyd's blood tests were clean - which you also cannot do, and it was to demonstrate the sToOPidiTy of you asking me to prove Margo DIDN'T use loaded gloves against Cotto.

I don't have to prove that Margo didn't use 'PASTIC or PARIS' or 'SPASTIC of SCAR' or any other such substance, for I was not the one announcing that he used loaded gloves against Cotto. That was you, am I correct?

 

hahaha, like most other pompous people, your misplaced sense of pride has led you to making yourself look like an idiot

 

I didn't even bother to read, that should leave you feeling more pathetic.

Got to love how you tried to sound smart bringing up Hatton/Mayweather roids as an example and then found yourself exposed as one with no boxing knowledge.

"no proof lols i winz"

 

Oh, one liners take seconds to reply to - it's the over-inflated paragraphs of trash you post here that take a little bit longer to get back to you on :yep

As for the rest of your post about note-taking....ummmm?

Speaking of caravans, why are camels called the ships of the desert?