Whose Undefeated record means more?

Calzaghe and Mayweather because they fought all conceivable challengers and took on the best of their era.

 

1. ROcky Marciano
2. Floyd Mayweather
3. Ricardo Lopez
4. Joe Calzaghe

 

You're high.

 

Rocky then Mayweather. Rocky changed ERAs when he beat Louis, if Mayweather can beat JMM,Pacquiao (which would decide this ERA) then the WW champ he will be #1, until then its Rocky.

 

Are you being sarcastic?

 

Rocky and Ricardo, Calzaghe would go next, and... well Mayweather's record doesn't mean ****. Calzaghe fought both jones and hopkins, mayweather fought........

 

lopez first... mayweather can still do something about it though

 

.....? Another epic fail?

Fought Jones? Calzaghe fought a washed up JOURNEYMAN.

 

Washed up yet he was a belt holder? Stfu, you're an idiot

 

Jones was a beltholder in his dreams maybe. He was toast by the time he fought Calzaghe.

Order:
Marciano
Mayweather
Lopez
Calzaghe

I still rate Lopez higher than Floyd all-time due to a small push from H2H, and while Lopez faced a higher proportion of the top competition than Mayweather did, Mayweather's best competition was still better than Lopez's.

 

Man you're terrible. Jones wasn't a belt holder going in against Calzaghe.

First Prescott is Khan's third fight and now Jones was a belt holder going in against Calzaghe. I suggest you improve your boxrec skills before typing, by the way, Calzaghe isn't Jones' second professional fight if you're confused with this one too.

 

Oh wow, just because I got confused by 1 thing. You're ****in stupid. All I hear from you is "boxrec" why don't you look something up yourself? You are truely a PBF, I can tell by your ignorance

 

wether a fighter's record is undefeated or not doesn't matter.

 

Welcome to ignore list, tool.