Isn't the term "great white hope" outdated?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by referendum, Jun 2, 2009.


  1. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Ask, you, what?
     
  2. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    That is racist IMO, I don't care what the **** you say. Blatant racism.
     
  3. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    That is a good post & my thoughts exactly. What part don't you understand? I'm not going to debate it either, my mind's made up.
     
  4. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    There is no point in that term, and short of the marketing for Cooney-Holmes, there hasn't been for decades. It didn't make sense when there were black champs, and it makes even less now because I'm not sure how you can get much "whiter" than some of the guys who've been winning titles the last few years.

    As for blacks, or anyone, being naturally superior fighters, I can't take that kind of **** seriously when I read it. It's one of the biggest backhanded "compliments" I can think of to all the black fighters who work their asses off to become contender and champion level fighters because it implies you can be both lazy and great. You can't be both a lazy champion and a good one. Maybe someone should've told Bernard Hopkins, Holyfield, Hagler, and the rest that it turns out they didn't need to put all those years in at the gym to refine their skills after all, because they were "naturally superior".
     
  5. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    I hate to say it, but it may also go back to property law when ANY black blood meant you were subject to being "property".
     
  6. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Well said.
     
  7. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    its objective. its not racist to say that black atheletes are more gifted and you're only sayng that becase yuou're lonely and reaching for something...and you are....
     
  8. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    That's an interesting concept, racism within a race.
     
  9. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    It is clearly out dated. Clearly.

    By a million miles. :yep
     
  10. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    It is interesting, and I wish it was just a concept.
     
  11. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Y'know I was going to point that out too.................as if to diminish the efforts of Black fighters since after all they already have the upper hand. I don't believe that, I think the Greats developed into the greats they were. There may have been a small amount of inherited skill or talent but 85% more than likely is developed in the gym.
     
  12. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    its more than a concept but your perception is based more on what you know right now....
     
  13. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Damned. Never thought of that. Excellent point. That said, I do believe you have abilities they are born with. It isn't just hard work that makes most world class sprinters black. :D
     
  14. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Yeah, keep writing in ******ed poems like that. You're only impressing yourself.

    So Joe Louis didn't have to work his ass off to become the Heavyweight Champion of the World right?

    I don't have to reach too far to see you're a racist. :D
     
  15. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    what the **** are you taking about?????