is pac bigger in size than JMM and PBF?

^^. beats me. i have always thought pac and jmm were the same. pac was actually smaller than jmm at 126. here is a sample of a floydette who insists that pac is bigger than jmm. and insists that pac appears bigger than pbf in some aspects.


Originally Posted by scatterbrain

This content is protected

let me read it again.

pac is bigger than JMM?

Yes, as evidence by the fact that Pac has been able to comfortably make 147.


i don't know what **** he was smoking but it must be some great hallucinogen.

 

beats me man. 5 posters actually think pac is bigger than pbf and jmm.

should these people be lined up and shot. or should they be banned from this site.

i mean, i know i posted that option in my poll, but i never thought people would actualy believe it.

and 52 posters actually think pac is bigger although in fairness, they had their reasons. that pac adapted more to 135/140 based on his performance against dlh and hatton.

i can understand those who say that pac is bigger, because most of these votes were qualified by them.

 

atschmake that 7 posters who think pac is bigger than pbf and jmm.atsch

are we looking at the same fighters?

jesus christ.

 

will do. i just didn't know we have that many morons here. :yep:rofl

 

fair enough although i seriously doubt pac was around 148 in his last fight against hatton. he weighed in at 138.

and for me people put too much emphasis on weight but not the natural advantage of pbf.

pbf is taller and has longer reach. and look at the upper torso compared to pac.

me thinks that one big reason pac goes up to 145 range during fight nights is his thick legs which gives him a lot of balance.

but this is boxing and not MMA wherein a fighter can use his feet. in these case, pbf truly has bigger arms, torso, longer reach and taller in height also which gives pbf the advantage in this fight.

 

new glasses or a couple of billions of new brain cells perhaps.