Why Would Anyone Want JMM To Win? This Would Be Like....

There were so many of those movies in the 80s, it's hard to distinguish any of them.

 

hmm says... that's the one.. he also does two splits in that dance and the Thais in the background are like wtf...

 

Steven Segal pre-10000000 ham sandwiches had better moves.

 

there all classic though

 

Chameleon?, is that even name calling?, you need more help than I thought man!

And how can we back up his actions other than waiting to see?, complaining like a thousand sluts on their periods does nothing and you know it. He never kept his word?, remind of some incidents where he never kept his word?, you responded to NOTHING I typed there apart from personal negativity with nothing to back them up either. :nut

 

I don't understand why it pisses you off, the majority of fans I see are extremely happy about a possible Mayweather/Pacquiao fight FAR more than a third fight with Marquez. As far as action guaranteed it's all based on style as I said, certain styles don't engage enough and tend to outbox/outscore/outpoint, that's how it goes, guys like Mayorga dont' have that so they charge in head first, guys like Margarito too. I appreciate watching all styles but when it comes down to it, skills/movement/speed/defense comes FIRST when you want to get yourself involved in boxing. Going in face first is no skill and no future in this sport either.

Floyd vs Oscar should have been shown on ESPN?, please man. All those fights deserve to be shown on the big picture. Don't try and make YOUR personal taste as it's final and official, other people have other views too, you got to respect that as the "grown up" you claim to be.

 

But it is fun.

And you do feel refreshed afterwards.

 

man, i've been quoting you word for word, just cause it aint what you wanna hear dont mean it dont make sense :deal

at 140 he said he would fight kostya, ricky and cotto.....NEVER HAPPENED...the ricky fight came after his limitations were kind of exposed.....

at 147 he said he would fight cotto, margo and mosley...and again, those fights never happened....and i am well aware that 1 time the mosley fight didnt happen was his fault, but since your all about politics, you should understand why....he stepped aside to let daddy oscar jump in....and though i hate what mosley did, it was what floyd wanted anyways....

at 154 he just gave everybody a little tease....after saying he would fight the best from 140-154, and no scar, not everybody thinks oscar was the best at 154 :good


and i called your chameleon cause of you ability to change colors :freddy

 

Whatever floats your boat. :good

 

it's very few that appreciate that safety first style....me, i dont mind it...but when they're hyping themselves up to be something they aint, that urks me....when they hype the fight to be something it aint, that also urks me....when floyd was saying he was gonna go in there to KO oscar, and only went in there to last 12rds, that urks me....

again, not saying those styles are bad, but it aint what they make it out to be.....the majority of fans wanna see fighters fight, not fighters try to survive....i mean, it's ugly, but i think i speak for the majority when i say **** like that.....

even oscar knows that....when he was coming up head hunting wanting blood, that made him who he was....when floyd turned him into a shell, that's when all the hate started coming....true or false ???

 

Not I. For me Marquez/Pac III is the fight to see. I don't care about the "BIG MONEY" picture. Boxing's reliance on 1 big fight a year is part of its problem anyways. For me, it needs more Marquez/Pac III type fights and less cash in bouts. Now granted, Floyd vs Pac would be highly intriguing and certainly worth seeing. I think it's an oustanding fight and doesn't fit in my idea of a "Cash in" fight. That said, Pac Man vs JMM III is what I'd love to see.

The 3rd fight between two fighters extremely close in skill, heart and boxing intelligence. To me, it's the best fight to be made in boxing and would HOPEFULLY give us a clear definitive answer in one of the best stories in boxing. So far we've had a beginning and a middle...but we're stuck on some sort of Empire Strikes Back-esque cliff hanger. The need for closure is more important to me than the need for a superfight we might not ever see anyways.

 

Stop taking yourself so seriously. That's basically what I'm trying to say.

 

Yes it is.

 

I disagree and will continue to do so until otherwise noted.

BTW what's with the name change?

 

Mayweathr-Pacman is arguably one of the top 5 biggest fights in boxing history.

It has the potential to be HUGE.

Thats why I want to see it because you dont get any better than 2 p4p #1's.

I do want to see JMM/Pac 3 though.