Fact or Fiction: Younger Hopkins...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Kaki, Jun 7, 2009.


  1. Kaki

    Kaki Guest

    #1: Younger Hopkins (vs. Johnson, Trinidad, Holmes etc.) was very athletic.

    #2: He would have torn a prime Calzaghe a new *******.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    yes and yes.
     
  3. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Hopkins had already been fighting for over a decade by then and had already become a very intelligent fighter. He was very athletic in younger days though, underrated handspeed.

    That version of Hopkins would have beaten "prime" Calzaghe easily as "prime" Calzaghe doesn't really exist. The younger version of Calzaghe was much more reckless, easier to hit and didn't apply the ring generalship he relied on as he aged as effectively, he also fired up when hit a lot more, leaving himself even more open. Hopkins would have beaten the "physical prime" Calzaghe soundly.

    The Calzaghe that fought Lacy however would give any version of Hopkins a tough fight, though i would favour Hopkins of 2001 to win it on cleaner punching.
     
  4. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    Yes and yes.
     
  5. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    A peak Bhops would've embarrasses slappy.
     
  6. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,964
    3,447
    Jun 30, 2005
    No, I don't think Hopkins ever would've "torn Joe a new *******". Win, yes, but not a Johnson/Mercado 2/Trinidad type domination.
     
  7. Brit Sillynanny

    Brit Sillynanny Cold Hard Truth Full Member

    2,653
    4
    May 1, 2009

    Undeniably.
     
  8. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
  9. zarman

    zarman Guest

    no, hopkins used the only gameplan that might have worked. a younger hopkins would have been beaten nether the less.
     
  10. Kostya Zoo

    Kostya Zoo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,803
    0
    Feb 6, 2006
    yes on 1. calzaghe always gives hopkins serious trouble, maybe for different reasons at different stages of his career. younger hopkins never fought anyone as large as calzaghe. and remember - hopkins is still in his prime age aint ****
     
  11. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Hopkins was most definitely athletic early in his career. He would have beaten Calzaghe in a very good fight. Maybe 116-112 or so. Calzaghe himself is a tremendous fighter and would not get dominated by anyone, I reckon.
     
  12. superchile

    superchile Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,939
    1
    Jan 18, 2008
    hopkins aswell as calsaghe got better whit age but hopinks bigest win was against overblown fighters de la hoya, trinidad
     
  13. darkness

    darkness Member Full Member

    358
    0
    Aug 10, 2005
    Yes too both. A well past his peak B hop knocked down calzaghe and lost very close he wins by a 9 to 3 or 8 to 4 margin in his prime
     
  14. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
  15. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,964
    3,447
    Jun 30, 2005
    I don't really think too highly of the De La Hoya win. It was great for name value, but wins over the likes of Trinidad, Johnson, and especially Tarver were better.

    Trinidad may have won his first belt @ 147 but he was a very big welter, who had destroyed the consensus #2 MW in the world before fighting Hopkins, and was the 3-1 favorite.

    It was really only afterwards that all the blown-up welterweight criticism came about.