01 In Jin Chi VS 04 Manny Pacquiao

Pac by KO,Chi didnt have the skills to handle Pac and his defense was terrible this wouldve been a mismatch.

 

The guy lost a well fought decision to Morales....


The same Morales that beat Pac.....

The HUGGERY is STRONG in this post... I can feel it.

 

but you forget to add morales didn't easily beat pac, it was fairly competitive.

The HATE is STRONG in this post.... my ***** can feel it.

 

lmaoo at fought a well decision to morales. What the hell is the difference? They both loss to morales atsch
Morales-Chi scorecard
~ referee: Jose Cobian | judge: Lou Filippo 116-111 | judge: James Jen-Kin 117-110 | judge: Daniel Van de Wiele 116-112 ~

morales-pacman scorecard
~ referee: Joe Cortez | judge: Paul Smith 115-113 | judge: Dave Moretti 115-113 | judge: Chuck Giampa 115-113 ~

looks like pac had better effort than the chi who you claimed fought a well decision against morales.

 

exactly and the scorecard i posted proves it Pac loss to morales no doubt but it wasn't as bad as chi losing to morales.

 

So did Espadas and other fighters that fought Morales,Erik had an habbit of making the fight harder for himself by fighting to his oponents level.

Chi was a tough kid but nothing more,he never beat anyone close to Pac´s level.

its obvius that the only Chi fight youve seen is against Morales and based on him being competitive with Morales you think hes better than he really was.

now do you have any smart coment to make other than accusing someone of being a nutthugger for picking the far better fighter to win.

 

Pac by KO.

 

If the haters are going to pick anyone to beat Pac at least pick someone good instead of guys like Chi and Valero.

 

:good

 

Pac would make KimChi out of that guy

 

It would be David Diaz all over again.

 

Yea but Morales gave away the last round to pac