Kelly Pavlik Vs Carl Froch: Arum - "Could Happen As Early As Next Jan"

So whose hand breaks?

 

Stop makn excuses ur man got the **** beat outta of him by a 43 year man. Heres an idea pull Pavs dick outta of your mouth. Men are havn a conversation? You cant be serious. Your not a man. Stop gettn so emotional.

 

Are you calling Thomas Hauser a liar? Like I said, you have no clue what goes on in the boxing world. Your just another **** talking noob. However, you may have set a record for making my ignore list. 41 posts is pretty fast.

 

So did yours...

 

What a great post...:rofl

just for you unclepaulie...:yep

 

:good

EDIT--I figured it out BTW. Just didn't want to admit to the fail...

 

Posted especially for my old buddy Scar:yep

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORzOAkK9oNI

 

Hey Relentless -- I just want to take a moment to remind you that back in september of '07 you made a thread entitled "after Taylor beats Pavlik." Not "if" but "after."atsch

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15284

 

Its amazing to me how quickly some people on this site seem to sprint to one polar extreme on the other as soon as a fight is mentioned???

Anyway, though I like Carl for his attitude and come forward style I would favour Pav here. Carl has a good chin but is too easy to hit, any chin can crack under repeated fire. For me Carls best shot is to catch pav with something big early and finish him off as otherwise he is broken down to a late KO or wide UD for me.

What are the chances of that happening? Taylor caught him early and nearly had him out. I heard people say pav stuck his chin out and got careless and that it won't happen again. Prob not but if it happened once there is always a chance it can happen a 2nd...

I will be rooting for Froch to pull it off for us Brits but in all honesty I 70-30 in Kelly's favour

 

Boo,i didn't think it possible that me and you could agree on anything,but your quote above is exactly how i see it.:good
As for Hauser,i think his writing is a tropical island in a sea of ****.
I still think Kelly's loss to Hopkins was 50% the weight and 50% Hopkins boxing brain.Kelly may have good fundamentals, but he is very predictable.BHop had a gameplan and it worked,Kelly made it easier for him by fighting at 170.
Froch may be reddened on one side of his face,but Kelly will be brutally KO'd,i just hope Kelly doesn't suffer any lasting damage.

 

Good matchup between the two i think it will come down to who has the better chin and want's it more.

 

No problem

 

I hear ya Boo but I'll have to ride with Froch over your boy Pavlik for this one.:good I just feel he won't be denied by Kelly especially at 168.

 

I've picked Pavlik but I don't think thats particularly relevant. Hopkins should be a lot better than Taylor based on how he beat Pavlik but that didn't work out.

The styles aren't the same. There is nothing that says Pavlik can do what Taylor did for 12 rounds except then last the distance because he's a completely different fighter.