lmfao!! So many holes in this post...u should state more facts and less opinions to get a better post little guy!
I give it to DLH. Prime PBF wasnt at 147 while prime DLH was. Of course to keep the pacmaniacs from getting in on it you have to remind them that prime 147 would school pac at 147 too but they wont believe it.
A prime PBF was given a gift decision against a past his prime DLH. A prime DLH would have easily beaten Floyd.
Dude, I was rooting for DLH and there's NO WAY you could possibly give it to him. The best i ever had was 6-6 when I was trying to give him rounds and ****ing smashed out of my mind. 7-5 or 8-4 FMJ is fine by me. Unless I'm drunk :silly
:rofl You've been living in Floyd's crotch far too long. Mosely, Vargas, Tito, Hopkins, Quartey were all better fighters than FLOYD! Keep in mind that if you switch their resumes(DLH and PBF), DLH would also be undefeated, and would have done so in a more impressiva manner than Floyd did.:deal
This is a good point. We don't know how Floyd would have fared but it's pretty obvious that DLH had a much better resume. Maybe Floyd would have dominated Oscar's comp to but if Oscar had fought Floyd's competition he would likely be undefeated today.
Mosley at 147? Yes. Vargas hell no Tito no Quartey Hell no Hopkins, maybe given the weight. De La Hoya loses to Hatton in 2007.
Despite the fact that Floyd was WELL ABOVE his own best weight? That's a convenient way to tint it how you want to. Floyd beats De La Hoya at any weight.