Did Compubox have it right?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by 5Burowz, Jun 13, 2009.


Page 1 of 2
  1. 5Burowz

    5Burowz Guest

    I believe Compubox had Clottey landing 222 punches to Cotto's 179. What do you guys think about that, is it accurate?
     
    5Burowz, Jun 13, 2009
    5Burowz, Jun 13, 2009
    #1
  2. 5Burowz

    5Burowz Guest

    bump
     
    5Burowz, Jun 13, 2009
    5Burowz, Jun 13, 2009
    #2
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    No Cotto probably landed less hitting gloves all night
     
    PowerPuncher, Jun 13, 2009
    PowerPuncher, Jun 13, 2009
    #3
  4. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009

    Everytime Cotto was throwing three punches he at least landed the right hand. Not to mention Clottey wasn't busy in rounds 10, 11, and 12, the championship rounds.
     
    Ripple633, Jun 13, 2009
    Ripple633, Jun 13, 2009
    #4
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,340
    15,936
    Dec 20, 2006
    It does not matter, a fight unfortunately is not scored on the basis of a whole encounter...but rather 12 itemized sections. based on that lederman had the score right by me, I just differed by swithing 10 & 11 with him.
     
    PhillyPhan69, Jun 13, 2009
    PhillyPhan69, Jun 13, 2009
    #5
  6. boricua_cotto1

    boricua_cotto1 LATIN KINGS Full Member

    2,130
    0
    Mar 31, 2009

    exactley
     
    boricua_cotto1, Jun 13, 2009
    boricua_cotto1, Jun 13, 2009
    #6
  7. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    no, compubox is **** and should never be used to score anyway
     
    Jorodz, Jun 13, 2009
    Jorodz, Jun 13, 2009
    #7
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    No he didnt and Cotto wasnt landing in those rounds either
     
    PowerPuncher, Jun 13, 2009
    PowerPuncher, Jun 13, 2009
    #8
  9. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Compubox and it's meaningless stats can go to ****ing hell for all I care.
     
    J.R., Jun 13, 2009
    J.R., Jun 13, 2009
    #9
  10. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Exactly!
     
    J.R., Jun 13, 2009
    J.R., Jun 13, 2009
    #10
  11. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    Better than judges who had it to Cotto
     
    PowerPuncher, Jun 13, 2009
    PowerPuncher, Jun 13, 2009
    #11
  12. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    All I know is that Cotto landed 35 of those 179 in one round.
     
    1lehudson, Jun 13, 2009
    1lehudson, Jun 13, 2009
    #12
  13. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Those mother****ers are blinder than Jim Lampley when it comes to adding up clean punches. :nut
     
    J.R., Jun 13, 2009
    J.R., Jun 13, 2009
    #13
  14. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,750
    3,447
    Feb 17, 2008
    Not really. They just tabulate things that ALWAYS benefit the house fighter. No different really than the job the judges do & pay attention to the house fighter. You can probably count on 1 hand and have fingers left over the amount of times it's the house fighter getting screwed the last 25 years in the sport.
     
    zadfrak, Jun 14, 2009
    zadfrak, Jun 14, 2009
    #14
  15. Chiko_Tech

    Chiko_Tech Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,638
    44
    Mar 6, 2006
    You had 6,700 post and 6,000 of them are hating toward Cotto. Cotto is a great fighter for the fans so shut up.
     
    Chiko_Tech, Jun 15, 2009
    Chiko_Tech, Jun 15, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2