Pac will destroy Cotto...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Soriano, Jun 13, 2009.


  1. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    I'd rather prefer that he fight Mayweather/Marquez.. At least this fight is 50-50 chance of victory for each fighter.
     
  2. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    :confused: you went from destroy to 50-50
     
  3. boricua_cotto1

    boricua_cotto1 LATIN KINGS Full Member

    2,130
    0
    Mar 31, 2009
    No he wont stfu cotto couldent perform 100% becuase of his cut cotto will sit pac the **** down
     
  4. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,583
    34,397
    Jun 23, 2005
    I actually agree. Pac would stop Cotto and I said this before this fight tonight.
     
  5. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    Why would pac destroy cotto? Cotto has looked vulnerable as hes been getting backed up by bigger guys.

    Im not saying Pacquiao couldnt/wouldnt win
     
  6. chicharoncuneta

    chicharoncuneta Member Full Member

    236
    0
    Jun 13, 2009
    If that version of Cotto shows up against Pac, Cotto will be owned.
     
  7. kintosol

    kintosol New Member Full Member

    40
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    I doubt it, cotto had problems with clottey's speed but even more with clottey's defense. Pac is a great fighter but his defense need a lot of improvement if he wants to fight ww.
     
  8. Chiko_Tech

    Chiko_Tech Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,635
    42
    Mar 6, 2006
    Ok Pac would destry Cotto because coot fought a a bigger stronger guy with a lot of boxing skills, with a very tight defene, and with a cut very nasty. And you say little man Pac would destroy Cotto i would love to see this fight. just to see if you are right.
     
  9. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,735
    15
    Apr 6, 2008
    go jump in front of a truck you drama queen
     
  10. Flex

    Flex New Member Full Member

    52
    0
    Jun 13, 2009

    co ****ing sign 100% agree

    end thread
     
  11. RealBoxing

    RealBoxing Kill The Nonsense Full Member

    2,783
    0
    Feb 15, 2009
    Pac fans are funny doe...I thought clottey clearly won but these pac fans are funny.....Cotto is to big for pac but pac is elusive....Cotto beats pac.
     
  12. Chiko_Tech

    Chiko_Tech Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,635
    42
    Mar 6, 2006
    People need to watch boxing more to understand that stiles makes fight i would love to see Pac vs Clottey how would he performs.
     
  13. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    judging from his fight against clottey, i think pac can land and hurt cotto with his fast, accurate left hand. i dunno if pac wins this though as cotto is a very big guy (160+) and punches hard too.
     
  14. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    The problem with Pac vs guys like Cotto, Shane and Mayweather is that he isnt hard to hit. That is what would be is downfall at the hands of all three of those fighters. Oscar said that Pac doesnt hit hard, and Shane I think is stronger then Oscar, who was a zombie in that fight. I think that is what is misleading many Pac fans into thinking that pac will beat those fighters. Hatton has no D and is really easy to hit, and he just walks into punchers. None of those guys will do that. Those are I think very hard fights for Pac to win.
     
  15. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    I actually think with the right fight plan, Pacquaio will be an easier fight for Cotto than Clottey. Call me crazy if you want. Something about styles and sizes makes me think that way. People is going crazy after DLH and Hatton victories. But reality is DLH was dead before that fight started. And Hatton.... Who the **** is Hatton????? Can't you remember how he looked against Collazo. Hatton is a piece of ****.