**Please explain to me your logic as of why Clottey won last night**

dude stop right there and never post again. how can you possibly say he was outboxing clottey when COTTO WASN'T EVEN LANDING. HE WAS JUST RUNNING BACKWARDS TRYING TO SURVIVE NOT EVEN HAVING THE SLIGHTEST INCLANATION TO ENGAGE. AND THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THIS HAS HAPPENED. THE SECOND ****ING TIME.

 

Watch the Mosley fight and watch this one again chump....cause Cotto was not the only one with inpeeded vison last night....you were too..:rofl

 

The one with the impeded vision is the judge who scored it 116 - 111 for cotto. But I guess in your world if you get hurt and get scared, running without landing wins you the fight no?

And you wanna know whats beautiful about this. you cant say **** otherwise. he got outlanded, he ran like a girl. gotta be great being a cotto fan. Running away from mosley, running away from clottey. No wonder im not a fan of his.

 

he found it very hard to break Clottey's guard plus he had a massive cut blinding his left eye, so he chose to use a different (and successful) tactic

not hard to understand....well, not for people over the age of 12

 

people dont understand that all these punchstats could be very misleading... when I watch a boxing fight, I score it round by round... it's not science or a math expirement... the few have to let go that clottey got rob... watch the fight round by round... both men fought a good fight... and credit for cotto for not taking it the easy way... fought with one eye and still was able to win this fight...:happy

 

If thats true then I stand corrected. I scored that round 10-9.

 

I had it 114-113 Clottey but have no problem with Cotto winning. But wtf with the 116-111? And please, don't make me watch the fight again, .

 

The clown who started this thread is in amazement that someone could score the fight for Clottey and wants people to explain why they think that. When really the most controversial part of last nights fight was the score of 116-111. If this assclown can't see that score being absolutely ridiculous, it must be because Cotto's ball sack is obscuring his vision.

 

He's puertorican and his analysis is pretty much based on which fighter was more puertorican. THink I'm wrong? ask him what he thinks of DLH vs Trinidad where DLH coasted the last few rounds in comparison to what Cotto did last night.

 

So in other words he probably started a link immediately after Hopkins/Trinidad saying it was a close but clear decision for Tito. This was because it doesn't matter who lands more punches, but rather you need to score on a round by round basis.