The book on Ruslan Chagaev

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Jun 11, 2009.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    When they meat in the ring I fillet will be a one sided barbecuing of Chagaev who will be chopped down after having been put through the mincer. I fillet will be Wlad bringing home the bacon.
    This is a medium to rare event ,sorry couldnt resist it! Eveyone likes a huge steak!
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Fight is on Sky Sports 2 in the UK around 10pm ,anyone know the betting odds?
     
  3. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    If you use this forum as a benchmark, Chagaev has a " skeleton's " chance to win.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    :good:good:good:good:good:good:good:good:good:good
    Laugh at yourself, and people laugh with you ,otherwise they laugh at you.
     
  5. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    i dont have Sky Sports im gutted
     
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Ezzard Charles was 28-29 years old and heavyweight champion 1950-1951....How is that shot?


    Jersey Joe Walcott recorded his career best wins and was heavyweight champion in the 1950s...how is that shot?

    Please Explain


    Ruslan Chagaev has no shot against a 1951 Ezzard Charles or 1952 Jersey Joe Walcott
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Lets see...

    Jersey Joe Walcott knocked out Hall of Famer Harold Johnson in 3 rounds, and twice beat Hall of Famer Ezzard Charles including one time by devastating one punch knockout. Walcott also defeated top 10 rated Omelio Agramonte and Undefeated European Heavyweight Champion 6'6 220lb Hein Ten Hoff. Walcott also was ahead on the cards after 12 against a Prime ATG Rocky Marciano.


    Compared to Chagaev....Thats a milestone. H2H, Walcott easily beats Chagaev.
     
  8. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Was that due to a Johnson back injury or not? I think i remember you posting an article about it, but i forgot whether or not it was a "legit" win.
     
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Yes, it was due to injury, and the press report said Johnson collapsed in the Walcott fight without being hit.

    Walcott’s record in the 1950’s was 6 wins, 4 losses. 60% winning percentage.

    Charles record in the 1950’s was 30 wins, and 20 losses, six of the losses were via KO! Also a 60% winning percentage.

    Chagaev’s record in the 2000’s is UNDEFEATED at 25-0-1 with a 96.15% winning percentage. I think it is clear that Chagaev would be a top 5 heavyweight in the 1950’s, and I highly doubt he get Ko’d or lose to journeyman as Charles and Walcott did in their careers.
     
  10. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    I was talking about decades here Suzie Q.

    Walcott’s record in the 1950’s was 6 wins, 4 losses. 60% winning percentage.

    Charles record in the 1950’s was 30 wins, and 20 losses, six of the losses were via KO! Also a 60% winning percentage.

    Chagaev’s record in the 2000’s is UNDEFEATED at 25-0-1 with a 96.15% winning percentage. I think it is clear that Chagaev would be a top 5 heavyweight in the 1950’s, and I highly doubt he get Ko’d or lose to journeyman as Charles and Walcott did in their careers.

    Now, if you think Chagaev is not a top five heavyweight in the 1950's, please list 5 who were better. And make sure they were winning at least 80% of their fights, were not down multiple times, and were not Ko'd multiple times. I'll spot you Liston and Marciano.
     
  11. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Goto the Brit forum of boxrec.com and usually someones posting a stream :good
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    Nope. Me and Old Fogey and others did research on it, we found that it was a legite victory. Johnson was knocked down by a Jersey Joe Walcott combination in the 2nd round and UPON getting floored, hurt his back. It was due to a walcott punch that johnson got hurt. In the 3rd round johnson collasped, some say still dizzy from the knockdown and getting pummeled by walcott, other reports say he just fell. However Walcott was winning the fight handidly, had KNOCKED DOWN johnson, and johnson did not get injured UNTIL walcott floored him with a crisp combination. As far as im concerned, if you get knocked down by a punch and hurt urself on the way to the canvas....its a legit victory in my eyes. Hence the reason why Walcott got CREDIT in history for the "KNOCKOUT" victory rather than a No Contest.

    I also talked to a Famous Philadelphia Boxing Historian Chuck Hasson and another Historian who posts here as "Albinored" and he reported seeing it live and remembering it was a legit victory for Walcott.

    Heres what Chuck Hasson had to say

    "Jersey Joe Walcott knocked out Manyunk's Harold Johnson on this day in 1950 at the Philadelphia Arena. After looking good and out-boxing Jersey Joe at the beginning of the bout, Johnson was knocked down at the end of the second round by some hard shots. He was able to continue for the next round, but eventually toppled as he pursued Walcott, seemingly still dizzy from the knockdown. There was much concern, speculation of a fix, delayed payment of the purses, and talk of revoking Johnson's license. But in the end there was no scandal or misconduct found."

    This content is protected
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Mendoza,

    Please enough. You are simply going by boxrec. You have no idea what you are talking about. We have buried this case over a year ago when me and Old Fogey and MarcianoFrasier all posted information which stated Johnson did not hurt his back until after walcott had floored him with hard punches. You are wrong. if you wish to not give walcott full credit for victory then we will debate this, please start another thread
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    1. Sonny Liston- Chagev does not have a chance in hell
    2. Rocky Marciano- Chagev does not have a chance in hell
    3. Jersey Joe Walcott- Walcott would outclass him badly
    4. Ezzard Charles- Charles easily
    5. Floyd Patterson- Floyd would turn his face into hamburger
    6. Ingemar Johansson- Say Goodnight Chagaev!
    7. Joe Louis- Chagaev would never get away from Louis jab, louis takes the decision
    8. Archie Moore- Moore outsmarts chagaev
    9. Harold Johnson - Johnson outboxes and outjabs him
    10. Cleveland Williams- Williams outslugs and outworks him
    11. Zora Folley- Folley displays a jabbing clinic and boxing lesson
    12. Eddie Machen- Machen outcounters the counterpuncher
    13. Clarence Henry- Henry pounds away at chagaev
    14. Bob Baker- Baker beats chagaev in every department
    15. Nino Valdes- Chagaev doesnt have the power to earn Valdez respect
    16. Roland Lastarza- Lastarza wins a snoozer
    17. Rex Layne- Layne outworks chagaev in a brutal war




    ALL OF THESE men are better than Ruslan Chagaev
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Jersey Joe Walcott beat THREE hall of famers, 2 of them by knockout in the 1950s. How many hall of famers has Ruslan Chagaev beat?



    How sly of you to bring this up and nitpick charles record post 1954 when he was completley utterly physically shot. Charles record 1950-1954 is more impressives than Chagaevs. Chagaev was beneficial to have the controversial decisions go in his favor, while charles suffered some highly questionable decisions go against him(layne II, Johnson, walcott IV)