Bert Sugar: "Manny Pacquiao is the best Southpaw of All Time"

moorer??

 

Pep and Mayweather are the best Southpaws. Sugar doesn't have a clue what he is on about.

 

By the looks of it neither do you.

 

:-?:dance

 

Now that was 2 funny :arran

 

Hey would you all put Hamed in the list also?

 

Ok why would you not put Moorer in there. When he was a LHW if I do recall, didn't he win all 24 or 25 of his wins by some form of KO and that was his natural weight, not one decision. He did not lose until he started messing around wit natural HW and ur laughing?

 

So what? How does that him make "notches" above guys like Sweet Pea and Hagler.

The guy lost to a 78 year old George Foreman...he holds a few very solid and commendable wins at heavyweight. But is far from a great there.

Light heavy was not his natural weight...He was starting to struggle the make the weight as a 21 year old...and was gone by 23.

Michael Moorer at light heavyweight is a myth anyway...Yeah he knocked out everyone he fought but thats because he fought no one..His level of opposition is dismal there and he was barely even a legitmate titlist as the WBO had only just formed when he was fighting and had almost no credibility.

Marvin Hagler and Pernell Whitaker are among the best fighters I have ever seen...Michael Moorer would be lucky if he made the top 150.

 

You sound stupid as hell. So you say just by his level of comp you do not put him n there. Man ur one of them dudes that believes that the old school is so much better than the new school I can tell by how you talk. He did not start losing until he went up 2 weight divisions and started fighting natural HW. i am not taking nothing away from SP and Hagler, but what Michael Moorer did was destroy a division by being a lefty, which was rare back then and you know if. Yeah I have seen all of them box for years but what Moorer did in the LHW division will not be done by no one ever again and you know it.

 

:rofl

Moorer won a bogus paper title that was only just invented...defended it 8 times against absolute garbage fighters..then left.

Your right actually I can barely remember a titlist with a weaker record there since...and maybe like you said no one else will ever have such a crap level of opposition to boast about. I think Micheal's record is safe.

Sweet Pea was fighting at the same time as Moorer you ****ing tool...doesnt matter what era he is from he is a ton better...its really doesnt take much intelligence to see it..you simply have to watch them fight.
Here is an idea...whack in a tape of one of them...then straight after that fight pop a dvd or video of Moorer..If you cant decide then try again..and again and again and again..until you get into thick skull that Moorer is clearly inferior to both of these guys.

Michael Moorer has never come close to destroying any division he has ever fought in...period. The only thing destroyed was his creditbilty when he was beaten by a geriatric George Foreman and embarrassed inside 30 secs by David Tua.

 

Ok now you lost me. I am done with this.

 

:hi:

Hope this has been informative for you.

 

Nah I already knew what ur talking about. I'm n my 30's so I have been around for a min. I like to debate. It's fun instead of people agreeing all the time.