10-8 cotto r1 9-10 clottey r2 9-10 clottey r3 10-9 cotto r4 9-10 clottey r5 10-9 cotto r6 9-10 clottey r7 9-10 clottey r8 9-10 clottey r9 9-10 clottey r10 10-9 cotto r11 10-9 cotto r12 7-6 clottey.... my score card if your curious
Learn to use a spread sheet so you can total up the points. Rounds mean little once you have one that isn't 10-9. You saying draw?
And I've seen at least two where your scorecard was way off from the way the result should have been scored. Not suprisingly they both involved Paul Williams. 8-4 for Williams in the Quintana fight? What the **** were you smokin'?! :nut
no.. clottey won 7 rounds cotto won 5 rounds give cotto an extra point for the kd.... showing your maturity by making things up.... great poster.. ironic my card matches the guy who had clottey winning by 1 round...
Making things up my ass amnesia boy.. I've seen you post that card up before. Don't try and deny it I don't think he scored a 13 round fight, bro.
that was a mis communication on my part 7 points to 5 points... without the kd 7 points to 6 points... including the kd not 7 rounds to 6 rounds / 6 rounds to 5 rounds
Nice. Since the guy was local and I remembered that article I thought I'd post it to stir the **** some. He is well respected and I got a little tired of people calling him and idiot. I don't know if it was the second article or another I saw when going through the search, but he GUARANTEED Pavlik would be a title holder back in 2004. Three full years ahead of time. Of course had he been wrong at that point no one would have remembered.
I think clottey by 1 point is fair...if you guys have heard the crowd you would think cotto deserved to win by 100 rounds... definitely one of the loudest environments i have ever been in my entire life
it was a close round and the KD declaired a winner of the round and was rewarded an extra point on my card. I could see what your thinking but Clottey didnt do enough damage to warrant a 10-9 round.