Anybody picking Nate over Bradley?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jgorst05, Jun 15, 2009.


  1. jgorst05

    jgorst05 Active Member Full Member

    1,377
    0
    Aug 27, 2008
    if this happens, who you got? I personally think Bradley takes it. Nate's age and inactivity have a big impact in this one i think and then theres the weight but i dont see this as such a big problem.
     
  2. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    Yeah, I think Nate's age and inactivity will hurt him. I got Bradley as well. But I've only watched a few of their fights.
     
  3. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    6
    Mar 14, 2007
    I like Bradley at this point, but Nate is a very live dog. I think he could put pressure on Bradley like he's never felt before. Don't forget, the only top level fighters Bradley has faced are Witter and Holt, and both of them are low workrate fighters who hang on the outside. Nate will do his best to push Bradley out of his comfort zone. I can't remember against who, but I remember Bradley getting into trouble one round against a joruneyman pressure fighter on Shobox, and Nate is no journeyman, and can apply pressure if he wants to. It's just a question of whether his chin will hold up enough at 140 for him to really do so.
     
  4. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    I agree. Nate looked pretty bad in his last fight. I mean he hurt that guy alot and didnt have enough in the tank to finish him. I like Bradley if they fight, even though I dont think that highly of Bradley.
     
  5. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    Bradley is better than given credit for. I think Nate is in deep with this guy

    I'm a big fan of both, can't wait to see the fight
     
  6. MemoCan

    MemoCan *****49ers Express***** Full Member

    4,924
    1
    Jul 20, 2008
    I wouldn't underestimate Nate-Nate all the way.
     
  7. SOUTHERMOST

    SOUTHERMOST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,958
    218
    Oct 24, 2006
    Easy to pick Bradley much younger and faster Nate looked old last time he ate lots of leather from a feather fisted fighter. Bradley quick pace will be too much for Nate.
     
  8. Antwuan Maxx

    Antwuan Maxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,248
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    Nate killed himself trying to make weight. I think it's safe to say he was weight drained.


    I'm still not sold on Bradley. I think Nate beats him using his experience and a mean body attack.
     
  9. newrp01

    newrp01 Active Member Full Member

    504
    0
    Aug 3, 2004
    You forgot much better at headbutting too...
     
  10. boxingwizard

    boxingwizard Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,853
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    I think Bradley wins a close fight somewhat similar to the Holt fight but Nate will test him even more.
     
  11. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    6
    Mar 14, 2007
    Feather fisted? Funeka knocked Zahir Raheem into next year.
     
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,992
    17,454
    Jul 19, 2004
    I will be rooting for Nate, but I think Bradley beats him.
     
  13. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,882
    80
    Feb 1, 2007
    This is a very interesting fight. I have a lot of respect for both of these fighters, I like them both as athletes and from what I know of them through the media, as people.

    Campbell is one of my favorites so I am rooting for him.

    I don't think age or inactivity will hurt him. He is a gym rat and a dedicated fighter, despite not making wait for Funeka.

    I agree that he may have been affected by attempting to make weight vs Funeka, and he still came out on top in a very close fight, even knocking down Funeka twice, if I recall correctly. Also, Funeka is huge, and Nate has trouble with big guys, like he did vs Hlatshwayo who is now a welterweight.

    I think the higher weight of 140 is going to give us a better Nate Cambell and although Bradley presents a tough fight, he is smaller than Nate, so Nate won't have the size problem he had with Funeka.

    That being said, Holt pretty much shut out Hlatshwayo at 140 and Bradley did enough to beat Holt.....and Witter. This may not mean much though.

    Who was the fighter that bothered Bradley?

    I have a feeling that the judges are going to favor Bradley in this fight, being that he is a young marketable nice good guy champion and Nate is 37 and Nate is well, Nate.....so for Nate to win, he may need to win by a good margin to eke out a close decision.

    But, something tells me that Campbell has hit a certain stride in his career and his training. I have bought in to the way that he talks about it and the different things he practices. I remember how confident he was, willing to fight an over the weight Guzman.

    Bradley may be a very good fighter who can adapt, but Nate, I think, when at his best, shows flashes of brilliance. Something tells me he is going to get at least one knock down vs Bradley.

    Maybe everything I am writing is based on emotions and wanting Nate to win. I am going to have to find some deeper and more sound reasons to bet Nate before I make a wager.

    Bradley
    is
    no
    joke
     
  14. jgorst05

    jgorst05 Active Member Full Member

    1,377
    0
    Aug 27, 2008
    one thing for sure is im a lot more interested in this fight than diaz v malignaggi
     
  15. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Not sure yet but I'm going with Bradley so far, can't wait for the fight to get closer to make a final pick. Bradley is very underrated and willing to fight all.