Cotto would of won convincingly if there was no cut.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by LockDog387, Jun 16, 2009.


  1. LockDog387

    LockDog387 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,629
    0
    Mar 23, 2007
    Cotto was outboxing Clottey the first three rounds and even scored a knocked down in the first. The fourth round he was getting hit with right hands more often but Cotto still won that round. If there is a rematch I'm pretty sure Cotto would beat Clottey conviningly next time.
     
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yes, I agree. Clottey's beat punch was his head, no doubt about it.
     
  3. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    the "elite" cotto or the ghost of the elite cotto is owned by guy named antonio margarito.....

    a bigger puncher and faster guy then clottey would have had cotto in a world of trouble......i thought cotto won 114-113....

    but cotto has def. lost something, cut or no cut.
     
  4. elgu

    elgu Member Full Member

    126
    0
    Jul 21, 2007
    Yes he would have. After the cut Cotto tried to avoid exchanges and standing his ground because he couldn't see the right hand coming. Also Cotto's jab wasn't as good because of it.
     
  5. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Clottey would of won convincingly had he not been thrown down, low blowed and punched in the back of the head.
     
  6. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,314
    661
    Nov 13, 2008
    Clottey is a dirty fighter, 2 in a row now Zab and Cotto both head butted by Clottey intentionally. If Cotto did not have that big cut, he would have schooled Clottey.
     
  7. GmoNavarro

    GmoNavarro Active Member Full Member

    512
    0
    Mar 14, 2009
    No, cotto wasnt outboxing clottey in the first 4 rounds, the first round Clottey was dominating cotto clearly until the last 2 seconds of the knockdown, the second round was also a clear clottey round, the third one was close but i would give it to cotto, so saying what you say is like cotto was winning the first 3 rounds which isnt true, he was having trouble with clottey since the start of the 1rst up to the 3rd round dont blind yourself...
     
  8. GmoNavarro

    GmoNavarro Active Member Full Member

    512
    0
    Mar 14, 2009
    And GO WATCH THE FIRST 3 ROUNDS if you dont believe me...
     
  9. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Rewatch the Clottey vs. Zab fight...it was clear as day that Zab was cut by a PUNCH not a headbutt.
     
  10. Ivo

    Ivo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,351
    81
    Jul 20, 2004
    It would not be fair to ignore how the cut change the fight. It was a big factor as far as I am concerned.
     
  11. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    :lol:


    Wow did you seriously just post this?
     
  12. Ivo

    Ivo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,351
    81
    Jul 20, 2004
    The cut against Judah was due to a punch not a head butt On the other hand TV commentators keep saying Clottey is a dirty fighter. I tend to agree with that notion.
     
  13. daredevil1989

    daredevil1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Dec 9, 2007
    go watch before the cut genius it was cotto being outboxed. Clotteys defense was air tight but cotto was having troubles with clotteys offense even before the fight. Learn to score
     
  14. LaidOut

    LaidOut Whaaaaat? Full Member

    2,615
    941
    Mar 2, 2009
    The cut affected Cotto, but I don't know that he would have boxed substantially better without it. Clottey threw some heavy bombs in there, so regardless, Cotto had to not go rushing in, so I think the fight still would have gone the distance.
     
  15. MancMexican

    MancMexican Blood & Guts Forever Full Member

    5,152
    0
    Apr 23, 2006
    Yes, obviously. It amazes me that anyone would think differently.