Catchweights are creating a new weight division!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RafaelGonzal, Jun 17, 2009.


  1. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    2,154
    0
    Apr 6, 2009
    :huh..Get the **** outta here..:-(
     
  2. prideofvbeach

    prideofvbeach Top 10 Pound-For-Pound Full Member

    2,557
    0
    Sep 26, 2007
    LOL hey, it makes as much sense as this stupid catchweight mess.
     
  3. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    2,154
    0
    Apr 6, 2009
    Only these brainless ****head haters are making catchweight an issue..
     
  4. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,269
    69
    Aug 1, 2004
    You guys watched your first fights last week? By the looks of this thread, you'd think that catchweight fights were something brand new. They have been happening since the establisment of weight limits. So get over it...
     
  5. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    Err Manny has never fought at a catchweight.
     
  6. artofwar

    artofwar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    0
    Dec 20, 2008
    why dont you blame cotto for forcing pac to move up. two sides here and it seems pretty biased right now. pac weighing 147 while cotto weighs 160.
     
  7. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007
    I have to agree, I'm a fully paid up ******* but like you say its 140 or 147.

    Surely Pac at 143 ( for example ) v Cotto at 147 is the same fight ?

    It makes Pac and Roach look like they are looking for unfair advantages. if you want to challenge the guy , go to his weightclass.

    To be honest I think a 140 Pac smacks a 147 Cotto around , he's become too easy to hit