Compare Klitschko's Knockout Ratio With Mayweather's!

You should forget about the jr. middleweight division because:
1. When he fought De La Hoya, he did not win that fight. In fact it was a draw.
2. He did not dare to fight any real jr. middleweight besides the fat De La Hoya. De La Hoya was past his prime which was proven even in the fight with Forbes.

You should forget about the welterweightt division because:
1. Bladomir was never the best welterweight
2. Hatton never looked good at 147. Check the Collazo fight out.
3. He did not dare to fight the real welterweights like Williams, Maragarito, Cotto and Mosley.

His achievements at 140 could be argued as well. At that times Kostya Tszyu was the man to beat. Mayweahter did not dare to fight him.

I guess you could keep the lightweight and super featherweight divisions. Corrales was quite a strong opponent. So was Castillo who beat him in the first fight.

By the way Wladimir KlitschKO has 11 title defenses.

 

1.Oh it was a victory. I scored it for Mayweather like majority of people who has seen it.

2. You should also forget second Byrd fight. He was well past his prime which was proven in the fight against Povetkin and that light heavy who knock him out.
Also Brewster was well past his best and one eyed when Waldo rematches him, so you can forgot that one.
Rahman was past his prime so you should forget that one.


Vitali vs. Peter must be forgotten also because Peter was past it in that point. It was proven later in Chambers fight.
Vitali vs. Sanders can be forgotten because Sanders was old inactive golfer.
Gomez also goes out of the window because he was past his best and never looked good in heavyweights.

Waldo’s title victory from Byrd can be forgotten in that very reason also.
He was actually beaten by Golota and Oquendo before that. So he really wasn’t champion to begining with.
Peter wasn’t the best heavyweight either so you can forget that title when you are at it.

I guess Vitali can keep that Danny Williams victory and Wlad had couple of good wins against Ibramigov and Austin.

By the way. WBogus ment nothing back when Wlad have it first time.
Lennox was champion then so don’t count those defenses

 

jesus christ you're an idiot.

how about comparing floyd's boxing ability with that of wlad? should we get into that?

 

This is the most stupid argument i've heard for a long time.

f=ma, i.e. force is equal to mass times acceleration. There is more mass in the higher divisions, meaning more force and inevitably more knock outs.

Also, the level of opposition wlad has faced in comparison to floyd is laughable.

 

I agree I would rather watch the Klitschkos, Arreola, Pacquiao, rather than Fraud Mayweather. Hell I think that guys like Nate Campbell, Katisidis, Marquez, even Hopkins is much more entertaining to watch than Mr. Ribfaker. Most of the time he fights well over-matched opponents who are coming up in weight and all he does is pot-shot, run, and look to pile up rounds. He is talented no doubt about it, but I am far more impressed with someone like Vitali who will take a big strong fighter like Sam Peter and just completely tame him to the point where he is bringing him biscuits in his dazy dukes.

 

The dude is so ****ing dumb he probably doesnt know that he's creating a double standard.atsch

 

Incorrect, they make the best of them look like bums, something noone in history was able to do. Enjoy.

 

:verysad This is getting rather pathetic now...You cant be serious! Please shut you the hell up with this non-sense!

 

Man, I swear...you're one dumb poster...Look at the level of compitition...nuff said!:verysad

 

Wlad has KOed 8 of his last 10 opponents. That is what Heavyweights are supposed to do.

 

LOL, how about Klits made this generation of heavies look like the worst ever. Thinks about it.

 

Both are ****in boring....Add Bhop to the mix, now you have a good boring lineup....boring ****s!!!

 

The funny thing is that flash KO is all the chance they've got. Noone ever outboxes Wlad.

 

The only non-sense I see here is written by you. You can't be serious. What I stated is a fact. It is a part of an official WBC statement. What you stated was just your personal attempt to insult me. A fact is a fact. You may not agree with the reasons behind the WBC decision but I do not see you disputing it.

 

See, your problem is that you do not look at the level of competition.

So why do you see the piece of sawdust in another believer's eye and not notice the wooden beam in your own eye?