Compare Klitschko's Knockout Ratio With Mayweather's!

Wait, what? Mayweather? Why Mayweather?

Why pick a very different type of fighter in a very different weight division with a very different list of opponents?

Seems a bit odd. What's next, comparing Vitali to Eagle Kyowa?

 

Yet, it does not change the fact that Mayweather didn't fight a real jr. middleweight.


QUOTE=Antsu;4284294]
2. You should also forget second Byrd fight. He was well past his prime which was proven in the fight against Povetkin and that light heavy who knock him out.
Also Brewster was well past his best and one eyed when Waldo rematches him, so you can forgot that one.
Rahman was past his prime so you should forget that one.

Vitali vs. Peter must be forgotten also because Peter was past it in that point. It was proven later in Chambers fight.
Vitali vs. Sanders can be forgotten because Sanders was old inactive golfer.
Gomez also goes out of the window because he was past his best and never looked good in heavyweights.

[/QUOTE]

You tend to forget that Wladimir fought twice Byrd. Besides, when Wladimir fought him the second time, Byrd was the longest reigning champion.

You also tend to forget that Wladimir wanted to rematch Brewster right after their first fight but Don King did not allow it.

Rahman was just a substitude because Povetkin pulled out just like Davey Haye.

Peter was in his prime. Dominating champion. Spectacular KO against Maskaev.

Vitali playes golf too so that I do not see your argument about Sanders. A lot of people play golf. I do it myself.

Gomez was in his prime. Dominant cruiserweight. With solid wins against McCall \twice\ and Virchis - mandatory title defense. Vitali had to fight no matter what.


I can esily continue but the point is that you brought those Mayweather's 5 weight division non-sense when it is really 2 only. So keep it to that. It is not 5 weight divisions. It is 2 weight divisions. One of divisions that really only a few people care about. Public interest drops steadily there.

 

Hatred is blind!

 

No it is a 5 weight divisions. You thinking that he is yet to meet best in some divisions don’t change the fact that he has won belts in those divisions. You talk like it null every accomplishment in those weight classes.

By same logic Vitali and Wladimir accomplishments in heavies don’t mean anything because they refuse to fight number 1 guy.

Byrd being longest reigning champion doesn’t change the fact that he was past his prime in their second fight. You were the one who introduce the logic that beating past their prime fighters means nothing. If it doesn’t count in Floyds resume it sure don’t go other way either.

Wladimir wanting to rematch Brewster right away is mentioned in he’s great accomplishments atsch, but actually beating DelaHoya, Judah, Baldamir and Hatton means nothing. This is pretty weird way of comparing resumes and accomplishment.

Cruiserweight Gomez counts in Vitalis resume but Hatton don’t for Floyd because he wasn’t natural welter?


I could go on and on but the fact remains. You are idiotic Klitchko nuthugger whose logic is full of double standards.

 

KlitschKOs do not refuse to fight the best. There is no need to deny the obvious facts. The have been fighting the best. Chagaev is the best after KlitschKOs.

Mayweather is not fighting the best. He is handpicking a super featherweight for a comeback. Vitali fights the best in a comeback. Mayweather did not fight Willaims, Mosley, Margarito, Cotto or any real jr. middleweight. It is like DLH's title at middlweight. It means nothing. To you it may mean a lot but for the majority of people only Hopkins was the only middleweight title holder.

Hatton has never looked good at 147 while Gomez has had solid wins against McCall and Virchis. Is that so hard to understand?

 

They arent fighting each other what means they arent fighting best competition. By your standards that means their accomplisments in that weight means nothing because of that.

Hatton was undefeated p4p top ten opponent and you are comparing him to Gomez? atsch

Mayweathers title in welter is not a same thing than Hoyas midleweight title. Judah was Ibf, WBA and WBC Champ before losing to Baldomir.

Floyd beat Judah and Baldomir what gives him lineage for those titles.

Very different situation than DelaHoyas midleweight title.

 

:rofl

remind me again, how many title defences did big sam make?

do you really believe the **** you're spewing?

 

:dead

 

Of course KlitschKOs are not fighting each other. They are brothers for Christ sake. Are you out of your mind? KlitschKOs are fighting the best unlike Mayweather.

Hatton was a top 10 at 140. He was not a top 10 at 147.

Judah has always felt against strong opponents. And you forget that everyone considered WBO champion Margarito the real welterweight to beat. Not Judah or Baldomir. Margarito was the man at 147. Mayweather did not dare to fight him... just like he did not dare to fight Willams, Mosley or Cotto.

It is like Wladimir fighting Liakhovich not Chagaev.

 

I will remind you that Peter fought Vitaliy KlitschKO. That's why he did not make title defenses. If he had not fought Vitaliy, he could have done many title defense.

Do you want me to remind something else?

 

try watching the fights, then you will know. Wlad Kiltschko fights are boring. End of.

 

The only thing sam peter is "dominating"

This content is protected

 

No its more like Wladimir fighting Chagaev not Vitali.

Did you notice that your logic has so many double standards that this argument is kind of pointless.
I think that your hate to PBF and love Waldo/Vitlay is blinding you.

 

yes, please remind me when sam peter was a dominating champ, as claimed by you.