Compare Klitschko's Knockout Ratio With Mayweather's!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Farmboxer, Jun 16, 2009.


  1. rapidfire

    rapidfire Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,655
    2
    Jun 17, 2007
    Peter, a dominating champion ? Sam Peter ? The man who barely edged Jameel McCline ?

    :lol:
     
  2. rapidfire

    rapidfire Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,655
    2
    Jun 17, 2007
    BTW saying that either Klitschko is No. 1 p4p is pathetic. They just can fight tall, if they wouldn´t have their size advantage they would be ordinary. Now tell me how can that be p4p ? Chris Byrd, even when he was beaten twice by Wladimir, was a better p4p candidate.
     
  3. MitchellXX

    MitchellXX New Member Full Member

    16
    0
    Jun 18, 2009
    A knockout can make a good fight better. A knockout cannot save a sucky fight from sucking.

    Ruiz - Oquendo ended in a knockout. It still bored me into a temporary coma (I still respect both guys as boxers and men).
    If you wish to throw knockout and excitement into one sentence, look at Foreman or Tyson, not some 6'7'' guy that holds on for deer life in every round (over-exaggerated).
     
  4. Ivo

    Ivo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,351
    81
    Jul 20, 2004
    When Vitaliy KlitschKO fought Samuel Peter in a comeback fight, Peter was ranked at number 2 right after Wladimir KlitschKO. Any other memory refreshing needed?
     
  5. Drexl

    Drexl Your Hero Full Member

    4,427
    1
    Jan 24, 2005
    ******.

    Lewis fought a great tough fight with Mavrovic, who was undefeated European Champion at the time.

    Mavrovic had an awesome chin. He would have been a factor in the division for years if it wasn't for his unfortunate illness.


    Oh, and comparing KO numbers of HW's and smaller fighters is just plain stupid. Especially a smaller fighter like Floyd. He doesn't go for the KO like HW's do, because he knows he can win on technical ability alone.
     
  6. Ivo

    Ivo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,351
    81
    Jul 20, 2004

    No, it because Chagaev is ranked right after KlitschKO.

    Your logic created double standards. You, not me, brought up Mayweather's 12 title defenses. According to your logic Wladimir's title defenses mean nothing. Mayweather's ones mean everything.

    I think that your hate on KlitschKO and love for Mayweahter is blinding you.
     
  7. Antsu

    Antsu Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,144
    367
    Mar 5, 2006
    You inturduced the logic. Im just using same logic to Klitchkos.

    BTW. Im not Mayweather fan.
     
  8. Irishbc

    Irishbc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Mar 15, 2009
    Knockout ratio has nothing to do with how exciting the fighter is, I don't want to see prodding jabs and straight rights over and over again, even if it does KO his opponent.
     
  9. Drexl

    Drexl Your Hero Full Member

    4,427
    1
    Jan 24, 2005
    Fighting "the best" in the HW division is nowhere near fighting the best in 140/147.

    I like Wlad by the way, but the rest of the heavies are trash. And I can't stand Floyd. But this comparison is ******ed.

    Hatton wasn't "top-10" at 140. He was #1 at 140. And he was definitely in the top-10 at 147. Name 10 who you would have ranked above him at that time. :deal