Why are ESB'ers ignoring the cut in the Cotto fight

Call it whatever you want...Am I the one who's making threads about how Clottey would have won if he wasnt slammed on his knee or Cotto would have won because if it wasnt for that cut...You're the one who's bitching and moaning like some little spoiled brat. If you call my logic flawed then you must be calling yourself dumb...Didnt you not just say if it wasnt for Cotto's cut...Cotto would have done better??? Did you not just try to use this bull**** excuse...so why are you getting mad when someone oppose you pointless opinion with exact same thing?? (just from a flip side) If its not dealing with your fighter its pointless and lame??? The exact same can be said to your weak ass argument since you want to go that route.:rofl:rofl

Ohh, the irony in your post kills me!

 

You have yet to explain how that "knee injury" affected Clottey. ....

 

Am I the one that is using that as an excuse for his perfomance???:huh

You fail!

 

Lmfao!!! You are just proving my point more and more. Ok he feel on the mat front first.... how does that matter? Was he limping? No. After he was dropped did he complain about it any other time? No. If he didn't need to be treated for it, then it must've not been so bad then.

You're just sore because Clottey lost to the better fighter.

 

"Did you not just try to use this bull**** excuse...so why are you getting mad when someone oppose you pointless opinion with exact same thing?? (just from a flip side) If its not dealing with your fighter its pointless and lame??? The exact same can be said to your weak ass argument since you want to go that route"

Sounds like it to me, you fail. Now log off

 

Ty , but your words were probably too big for him

 

because this is a cotto hater forum.

 

Lets review your opening post then since you're having such a hard time remembering your opening post:

Didnt you not just make up an excuse on your very first post??? (the bolded, underlined part) You're the one who isnt being open minded at all...If you dont see the logic I'm using here then there is really no point of even keep the this going on...If you're going to use that cut as an excuse for his perfomance then others can simply use the knee as a legit excuse given that you're the one who brought it up...Yet you clowns want to say that arguemnet is weak when you're the one used the excuse first..

What kills me is that you have the audacity to call me names but you really dont have that much room to talk at all...Do you even understand the meaning of flip side at all?? Do you even know how to comprehend??? From what you're posting you seem to dont have a clue!

 

Get off the man's nut sack!

 

You keep on saying this bull**** about it going over my head but you've yet to prove me wrong...Dont get mad at me because I'm not buying your ****...Its an opinion that I refuse to acknolewdge..and you arguement is no better than mines for that matter...you doing the exact samething you're accusing me of doing....So keep on with this bull**** you're talking.

You didnt defeat no one with this arguement! Stop living in your fantasy world!:good

 

Cuts happen all the time in boxing and shouldn't be used as an excuse. Paul Williams fought Phillips and was cut in the 1st round and still stopped Phillips in under 10.

 

My point exactly but the thread starter doesnt seem to understand the point I was making to him!

 

its boxing... you will get cut. you will get a broken nose... the point is to avoid them. no ****ing exuses and just deal with it. End of discussion.