F*** The WBA, and their sister the WBC

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxing Genius, Jun 20, 2009.


  1. Boxing Genius

    Boxing Genius Member Full Member

    170
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    Since these are the two most scandalous boxing titles, I think they need to be removed and placed on a lower level so heres my list of new titles in order and these titles will depict the UNDISPUTED CHAMPION in each weight class.


    1. The Ring Title
    2. The IBF
    3. The WBO
    4. The IBO

    There it is the new titles to the Undisputed Championship
     
  2. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    The same WBO who ranked Gary Lockett number one? The same IBO who don't enforce mandatories and are basically just a piggy back belt?
     
  3. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,735
    15
    Apr 6, 2008
    won't somebody pleeease think of the children!
     
  4. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,868
    3,119
    Apr 16, 2005
  5. edgewood

    edgewood Active Member Full Member

    558
    5
    Jan 11, 2009
    the wbo has realy come to the front in recent years
     
  6. scilent assasin

    scilent assasin p4p Full Member

    1,016
    2
    Apr 25, 2009
    **** all abc title its all about the ring belt
     
  7. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    How?

    I would normally agree but they're declaring the winner of tonight's fight as their heavyweight champion. Is that right?
     
  8. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,152
    1
    Feb 20, 2006
    The "Ring Magazine Award" Heavyweight Championship of the World.
     
  9. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    I can't really make a case for any being better or worse than the other. WBO is in Frank Warren's pocket, WBC is in Don King's, WBA has terrible mandatories, **** up the heavyweight division and basically make up the rules as they go along.

    I guess the IBF is the best of a horrible bunch.
     
  10. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    The Ring title is the most legitimate and prestigious, in my eyes.

    The alphabettys are a level below that, IMO - and none are better or worse than the other.
     
  11. Losfer_Words

    Losfer_Words Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,385
    1
    May 30, 2009
    **** 'em all. I judge fighters by who they fight rather than the ABC titles. If I'm pushed then I'll plump for the Ring title but other than that it's not a massive issue to me.
     
  12. stiga

    stiga Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    May 27, 2009
    for me there just for making its official only ....
     
  13. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,868
    3,119
    Apr 16, 2005
    Amen. It's about time ALL these alphabet belts were put in the trash can where they belong. They are illegitimate, and the organizations that issue them are PARASITES on the sport of boxing.

    The RING belt is the only legitimate belt in the sport - no bogus rankings, no undeserved contenders fighting for belts, none of the bull****.

    And tonight, we will have a CLEAR HW champion as a result of this!!:happy:happy:happy
     
  14. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    No we won't because-

    1) They may draw.
    2) Vitali.
     
  15. onepunch.net

    onepunch.net Active Member Full Member

    1,314
    0
    Mar 7, 2007
    The same Ring that never requires the "champ" to defend against a top contender?

    The same Ring that has 12 of 17 titles vacant?

    The same Ring that allows a fighter to bounce around from division to division, and never defend the title?

    The same Ring that is allowing Adamek vs. Gunn for the title?


    just wondering........