Curry-Starling

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Jun 21, 2009.


  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    400,619
    82,427
    Nov 30, 2006
    Tell me about these fights. Worth hunting down?
     
  2. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Very much so. Especially the second, which is a showcase of some of the best clean in-fighting you're ever likely to see.
     
  3. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    34,895
    18,085
    Jul 29, 2004
    First fight is a little forgettable for action...But if you appreciate skill its worth watching.

    The 2nd was a great fight..Two very skilled fighters going at it at the top of their game.
     
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    I would agree, the fights were a little one paced, any modern fan would not like them, but fight two in particular has value to the connoisseur.
     
  5. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Don't bother wasting your money. The first one especially is dreadful. Starling the one at fault. he just didnt want to make a fight of it.

    the rematch was utterly one sided. Curry was truly his master

    A better suggestion: Get the Honeyghan Curry fight instead. It's like getting to see the one fight I always wanted but never got to see: Cuevas Leonard
     
  6. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Agreed. Just very good mixture of offense and defense at a high pace from both.
     
  7. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Cuevas would have been whooped on like a sissy by Leonard, you know this.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    400,619
    82,427
    Nov 30, 2006
    Wow, collective high praise offset by one very critical rooster. All things considered, being that I do appreciate highly skilled boxing (regardless of the presence or absence of knock-down-drag-out action) and especially appreciate clean in-fighting, and don't mind watching ultimately one-sided affairs, I think I am in fact going to go ahead and look into these. Was this rivalry pretty much the benchmark for both fighters or do they both have other, better showcases that demand a look as well? Rooster or anyone else, care to elaborate on what was special about Honeyghan-Curry?
     
  9. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    has anybody got these 2 fights im intrested in them
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    400,619
    82,427
    Nov 30, 2006
    I will, soon. :D
     
  11. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    I have the first one unfortunately. If their is anything postive that came out of the second is that Donald gave Marlon a well deserved drubbing
     
  12. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Have you ever seen the first contest? just deplorable!

    Curry has an excuse though since he was weakened by the flu. as for Starling, this is one of those cases where I really believe the fighter should have had his money witheld

    he put in more an effort in the rematch-not that it mattered. I knew he was going to lose

    As for Honeyghan it shows the right type of opponent with the right style and tools to demolish a gifted boxer like Curry. He reminded me a little of Animla Fletcher the way he took charge of the opponent.

    This is a perfect example of taking the more skilled boxer out of his game. During the second round he scored heavily-all clean blows to the head with Donald's head lurching back. Donald was never the same after that and Lloyd would not let him catch a breather. A butt did influence the outcome but Lloyd was just getting stronger while Doanld could not stem the tide of Lloyd's attack. Again, Lloyd was tearing that boy up just prior to his corner stopping it which proves that if you got the offense, the superior boxer will cave in.

    The more intense the attack, the faster the outcome. We'
    ve all seen it:

    Hearns-Duran
    Hagler-Hearns
    Norris-Leonard
    LH-Donald Curry
    Louis - Schmeling 2

    and the famous Sandy Saddler winning 3/4 contests with Willie Pep

    there's others out there I'm just naming a few off the top of my head
     
  13. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    check yourPMs
     
  14. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,683
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
    Curry and Starling probably would've taken Cuevas as well, maybe McCrory.
     
  15. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    The second "Curry-Starling" fight of '84 was Curry at his peak handling a highly skilled Starling over the duration of 15 WBA title rds........... Curry always seemed huge compared to Starling........... Curry was perhaps a solid 154 pounder back then, but just dropped weight prior to those bouts...... Starling looked fit and comfortable at 147 pounds, but not strong enough there to beat Curry.......

    I cannot remember if it was the first fight or the second fight in which Curry was reported to be 156 pounds the day before they fought..... Curry dropped weight overnight and still beat Starling.......

    MR.BILL:deal:rasta:yikes