chavez vs pac at 140. no haters

No, its mostly full of sensible fans of boxing with the odd clueless **** threw in for good measure.

 

and please present the resume of both..hahaha..you will see a huge diffrence....

 

sensible?haha..

 

Not a lot either way in terms of resume, especially if you take into account how good the names on the resume were WHEN Pac & JCC fought these guys + Pac lost clearly 3 times, Chavez went 87-0 before (realistically) losing to Whitaker at age 31.

Try again.

 

you must be kidding..if chavez can see pacquiaos hands..

 

Camacho is a better BOXER than Manny, he came well prepared to stick & move but was closed down by a master pressure fighter in every single rd + Pac dont have the mentality to keep that up for the whole 12 rds without getting into a scrap.
Chavez would make him fight by cutting off the ring & bulling him, attacking his body & Manny would have no option but to go backwards - something he isnt comfortable doing - or get knocked out.

 

im out.. its a fan thread for chavez..

 

how and why? maybe in fight night round 4 he can win, oh by the way is camacho there?

 

im out

 

No virgins allowed on ESB after 8pm.

**** off :hi:

 

PAC will be sticking with the gameplan as he always does and would UD Chavez.

 

How many people ppicking chavez over pac thought that whitaker worked chavez?

 

:-(

Roberto Duran breaks him.

 

At 135-140 that's very debateable. De Jesus was able to knock down Duran on two different occasions. Chavez was a different beast altogether!:deal

 

I know you are a ******* in disguise.