116-111 is the scorecard everyone is making an issue about

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009.


Page 3 of 4
  1. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    What are you talking about? Clottey never put Cotto down in that round or even buzzed him in round 6. He was fighting back towards the end but was still taking a pounding on the ropes. So no, i'm not saying you have to score it 10-8 but you can make an arguement for it because he got swamped that whole round.
     
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    #31
  2. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    Your right. :D I forgot about the 10 point must system. But still though, that judge still probably gave him a 10 point round.
     
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    #32
  3. NickBarker

    NickBarker Damnum Absque Injuria Full Member

    2,554
    1
    Jun 20, 2007
    And I hope I didn't sound like a dick there. I make arthimetical mistakes like that while I'm compiling my round scores sometimes.
     
    NickBarker, Jun 21, 2009
    NickBarker, Jun 21, 2009
    #33
  4. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    No problem, I'll admit when i'm wrong. If you can't do that, than you can't swallow your pride. Which a real person should be able to do.
     
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    #34
  5. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    I gave an example of why you should NOT score those(Cotto-Clottey 6th round) kinds of rounds 10-8. Second, at no point in the fight did Cotto pound on Clottey even if it looked that way. The only 10-8 rounds should have been the first...period. What if one guy tries to hit the other guy but can't, and the guy who is winning the round is not landing the whole round, but is landing on the other guy. Should that be a 10-8 round? If a judge could make a case that the 6th round of Cotto-Clottey could be ruled 10-8 then Floyd-Gatti should have been 10-8 for almost every round in that fight.
     
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    #35
  6. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    People had a problem with the 116-111 scoring of Cotto-Clottey. Nobody thought Cotto won by 5 points...sorry!
     
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    #36
  7. jjax

    jjax Active Member Full Member

    1,432
    0
    Jan 12, 2008
    It's simple n*gganometry: 116-111 Cotto is a bad scorecard because Clottey won the bout.
     
    jjax, Jun 21, 2009
    jjax, Jun 21, 2009
    #37
  8. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    :lol:
     
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    #38
  9. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    The round before he got stopped, you could say it was 10-8 in the Floyd/Gatti fight. You could also say that Hopkins/Taylor 1 could have been 10-8 in the later rounds.
     
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    #39
  10. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    No he didn't.
     
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    Canibus81, Jun 21, 2009
    #40
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,779
    83,606
    Nov 30, 2006
    Clottey by one point is correct. Any wider for Clottey is wrong...any score for Cotto is wrong. :good

    Just like JMM-Pac II.

    Marquez by one point is correct. Any wider for Marquez is wrong...any score for Pac is wrong. :good
     
    IntentionalButt, Jun 21, 2009
    IntentionalButt, Jun 21, 2009
    #41
  12. Landshark

    Landshark Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,505
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    Nallege I had round 1 10-9 Cotto because I thought Clottey won the round but got knocked down, what did you score round 1?
     
    Landshark, Jun 21, 2009
    Landshark, Jun 21, 2009
    #42
  13. Landshark

    Landshark Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,505
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    :good:good:good
     
    Landshark, Jun 21, 2009
    Landshark, Jun 21, 2009
    #43
  14. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    10-8 for Floyd-Gatti yes, but not Hop-Taylor, and not Cotto-Clottey.
     
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    #44
  15. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    10-8. Clottey was not totally dominating the round, nor was he hurting Cotto in round 1.
     
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    NALLEGE, Jun 21, 2009
    #45
Page 3 of 4