Pacman is more efficcient boxer than Mayweather

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sweetray, Jun 22, 2009.


Page 1 of 2
  1. sweetray

    sweetray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,825
    0
    Nov 11, 2007
    Hatton is smaller than Mayweather. It took 8 rounds for Mayweather to stop Hatton.
    Pacman is smaller than Hatton. It took two rounds for pacman to stop Hatton.
    Against DLH, Mayweather got a split decision victory while Pacman
    dominated DLH completely and defeated him by TKO.

    Pacman a small fighter who started boxing at 110 pounds, have proved that Mayweather`s accomplisment is nothing that can`t be surpassed by another good boxer. If DLH, Moseley and Trinidad, had stayed away from big opponents such as Hopkins, Roy Jones, winky Wright and others, they would have remained undefeated the way Mayweather is. In my opinion, Mayweather is a shame for boxing since he claims to be the best in boxing history while staying away from real challenges. His biggest challenge was against DLH. This fight was decided on a split decision. Later Mayweather backed out from a rematch after having called for it. It is hard for a boxer to gain respect when acting like a coward. Pacman is an example of a real warrior as opposed to Mayweather. Do you agree ?
     
    sweetray, Jun 22, 2009
    sweetray, Jun 22, 2009
    #1
  2. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    hmm says... oh gawd, here we go again.

    well besides DLH being drained... they are both not good against southpaws.
     
    hmm, Jun 22, 2009
    hmm, Jun 22, 2009
    #2
  3. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    I agree but there are five threads like this a week.
     
    Leonit, Jun 22, 2009
    Leonit, Jun 22, 2009
    #3
  4. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    This thread has "Mayweather-Pac Hatefest" written all over it. Watch for tards from both sides bash the **** out of each other.:pop
     
    Sting, Jun 22, 2009
    Sting, Jun 22, 2009
    #4
  5. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I stopped reading here.

    It took Mayweather 10 rds to beat Hatton, you probably havent seen the fight, fair enough but at least put in the effort to look this **** up if your going to do a thread about it.

    Ps. Mayweather is a FAR better boxer than Pacquiao, wake up.

    :patsch
     
    Bill Butcher, Jun 22, 2009
    Bill Butcher, Jun 22, 2009
    #5
  6. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,295
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    OK here are the facts:
    Hatton came up from his comfort zone at 140 to fight Mayweather at 147.

    It still took Mayweather 10 rounds to KO Hatton.

    Pacquiao destroyed Hatton in 2 rounds at 140, where Hatton was most comfortable and the King.
     
    Powerman55, Jun 22, 2009
    Powerman55, Jun 22, 2009
    #6
  7. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    both are efficient, they just have different plans towards their respective fights. against hatton, i think pbf's plan was to outbox hatton, while pac's was to go for an early KO.
     
    dhenzrae, Jun 22, 2009
    dhenzrae, Jun 22, 2009
    #7
  8. P.4.P.G.O.A.T.

    P.4.P.G.O.A.T. Q Boro Killa Bee Full Member

    3,259
    3
    Oct 10, 2007
    Annoying thread - done 1,000 times...
     
    P.4.P.G.O.A.T., Jun 22, 2009
    P.4.P.G.O.A.T., Jun 22, 2009
    #8
  9. Solid Chin

    Solid Chin Concrete Wars Full Member

    3,953
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    Pointless thread, the thread starter doesn't even have his statistics in order.

    your boy started his career lighter than 110lbs

    Stupid *******...Stick to watching Pride FC and MMA
     
    Solid Chin, Jun 22, 2009
    Solid Chin, Jun 22, 2009
    #9
  10. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Im not disagreeing with that but it doesnt make Pac a better boxer than Mayweather, more exciting perhaps but not necessarily better boxer + the guy said FMJ beat Hatton in 8 rds, I mean c`mom, thats amateur schoolboy **** right there.
     
    Bill Butcher, Jun 22, 2009
    Bill Butcher, Jun 22, 2009
    #10
  11. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    15
    May 24, 2006
    Ali struggled with Frazier
    Foreman destroyed Fraizer twice


    Hopkins went all 12 rounds with Joppy
    Trinidad KTFO of Joppy


    styles make fights, of course a big puncher gets an earlier stoppage than a slick defensive boxer that doesnt mean the puncher is better:deal
     
    elTerrible, Jun 22, 2009
    elTerrible, Jun 22, 2009
    #11
  12. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    15
    May 24, 2006

    PBF beat younger and better versions of both of them.

    Pac fought PBF's leftovers:dead
     
    elTerrible, Jun 22, 2009
    elTerrible, Jun 22, 2009
    #12
  13. roy

    roy New Member Full Member

    46
    0
    Jun 8, 2009
    The facts clearly shows Pacquiao as the most exciting fighter but not necessarily better than PBF. That score can only be settled in the ring. Kudos to Pacquiao for boosting boxing during these times where you have boring Klitschko, a clown Floyd, a reserve Marquez, etc, etc. Gone are the days of the articulate De La Hoya, machinegun Ali, staccato Frazier, fear-stoking Foreman, etc, etc.
     
    roy, Jun 22, 2009
    roy, Jun 22, 2009
    #13
  14. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    15
    May 24, 2006

    I agree, but Marquez is becoming more exciting in the ring. He doesnt really have charisma per se in interviews but he has been more aggressive and going for the KO these days.
     
    elTerrible, Jun 22, 2009
    elTerrible, Jun 22, 2009
    #14
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,675
    83,518
    Nov 30, 2006
    More efficient in terms of rounds taken to beat common opposition? Okay.

    More efficient in terms of minimizing wasted motion in the ring (a truer sense of the term)? No.
     
    IntentionalButt, Jun 22, 2009
    IntentionalButt, Jun 22, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2