Berrio(legitimate top 10,coming off 2 KO wins over undefeated fighters in their hometowns) and Andrade. Not to mention Tatevosyan,Salem,Mock,etc.
Taylor was a good victory for Froch. But...Jermain was beating him easy... The "guy" from the contender would probably give hell to both Froch and Pascal (i know i'll get a lot of insults for that one)
I'M honestly trying to be the most objective as can be. And i also think i watch enough boxing to be consider a true boxing fan (which you also are, obviously). I think Bute is a much more complete package than Froch and Pascal. That doesn't mean anyone of them can't turn the lights out with one shot (its boxing after all). Sorry if i hurt your feelings.
I already said that...:huh I still think Bute is better than Andrade and that Taylor is better than Froch.
berrio was a good win, and bika was a good win, zuniga got ****ed up by pav at MIDDLEWEIGHT, so that win dosent mean much to me. Other then that, bute hasnt faced anyone of note. I think taylor and pascal are much more impressive wins then bika and berrio.
Hurt my feelings lol...!!!??? We are all men he for the most part. I have no problem with you thinking Bute is better than the two. When you win world titles, the word 'limited' more than likely might be meant for lower level champs like Gatti, Gamache, or even a Terry Norris.
Maybe. How would say that then? Technically flawed? ANd...a prime Gatti had better skills than Froch.
it could show that froch beat a fighter who maybe has developed since the defeat...u wouldnt say the guy to beat pac is an ATG for that would u