The fact is actually DID things that made him lauded as much as he is today. In my view he is legit and proven until proven otherwise - sometimes boxing fans tend to over think and would assume that they knew better.
Its a fact that Henry Armstrong has accomplished more in his career then pac has, and most likley ever will. (especially with this catchweight bs). you think armstrong ****ed with catch weights? He didnt need catchweights cuz he fought like a man. And thats a goddamn fact. Not an opinion. Go pick up a ring magazine and jerk off to the pictures of the fighters :hi:
ey, gonzarelli. you left without answering my question you sneaky little pacteron. how old was megan fox when she came out in the transformer movie???
I personally think that the comparison between Hatton-Floyd and Pac-Floyd are not correct. First Floyd is a slick boxer and it's normal to take him more time to finish an opponent than a puncher boxer like Pac. Also Hatton was an undefeated fighter and fresher fighter in the first fight. And Pac gained 10lb for the Hatton fight!!!. Not 2-3. That said I'm not a Floyd fan. For me is also very difficult to say how good is Pac. Hatton surely jumped like an idiot with his hands down. But if Pac beat my man Cotto no excuses. Pac is a monster if he do it. Some haters will say that Cotto was finished after the Margo fight but for me it's not true.
Who gives a crap, I never saw that movie.:deal Are you going to bring your Pedo tendencies into this thread too:blood
he beat barrera for the ring featherweight title... anybody who doesnt consider it a world title knows nothing about boxing..
well boxing analysts and historians use that comparison all the time. are you more credible than them.
:hey. owned. you said you would hit megan fox and now you claim you did not see the movie. :rofl:rofl oh well, you get a pass. hypocrites are owned. now go back to your pac hating ways, little pacteron. :hi::hi::hi: i know you admire JMM, but man, you need to let go of all this pac hating ok. its bad for the health.
I dont consider him champ at 126 after DRAWING with marquez. Marquez had a claim to the title as well by being the unified champ in my opinion. Im pretty sure he did it before pac beat barrera anyway.And some fat **** that writes for ring isnt gonna convince me
boxing analysts also compare any young agressive fighter with power to tyson. They compare Wlad to lennox. ect... You can take what these guys say with a grain of salt.
You really are a ******. Have you ever heard of a thing called TV.:rofl No go back to dreaming of underage poon..................You make this too easy!:deal
barrera was the king of featherweight at the time. he beat morales, hamed kelley just to name a few. pac beat the man which made him the real champ, not marquez.