Prime Holyfield vs Wlad Klit

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kolcade4, Jun 23, 2009.


  1. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    He had like 38 fights or so under his belt, was a pro since 96, which would make it 8 years he's been fighting in 03 when he fought Sanders and was WBO champ. Wlad was better in some things then, than he is now, and vice versa.

    Wlad was prime when he fought Peter, Williamson, and Brewster, Emanuel was in the corner for all of those fights. He looked far from impressive, he was knocked down a total of 5 times, several panic attacks, and was knocked against Brewster. There is your prime Wlad.
     
  2. petrozza

    petrozza The Great Visionary Full Member

    1,168
    0
    Mar 6, 2006
    Wlad is now better at the most important thing and the only thing that really matters - winning fights. So, his prime is now when he's the most successful than ever before.
    Your hate for Wlad just never stops, right? :lol::lol::lol: Still crying over Sammy Peter, aren't you? You shoulda followed your buddy swedeone's path and left this forum. At least he was man enough to do that when proven completely wrong on Peter vs. Vitaly.
     
  3. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Your right about one thing, my hate for Wlad will never stop until he's knocked out cold and is forced to retire, and even then I will be around to set the record straight when it comes to his career.

    I admit I was wrong about the Vitali/Peter fight outcome, so what? Vitali was out for 3 and a half years, I figured he would be rusty enough to where Samuel would be able to take advantage of him. I respect Vitali as a fighter, always have.
     
  4. petrozza

    petrozza The Great Visionary Full Member

    1,168
    0
    Mar 6, 2006
    You also claimed that Peter was really something - the next big thing. FAIL!
    Peter's career highlight will be his loss to Wladimir and those 3 knockdowns (2 to the back of the head).
     
  5. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    :lol: Wlad was excessively clinching, turning his back to his oppenent, and having numerous panic attacks. Wlad might of won the fight, but damn did he look fragile as hell doing it. You should watch a very interesting take on the fight thats currently on youtube, it chronicles Wlad's best moments enititled "Wlad the Octopussy", I think you will enjoy it, I know I did.:yep
     
  6. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    We speak English here dumbass....................I guess you're still working on sentence formation. Good luck with that :good
     
  7. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004

    Holyfield has never fought a fighter with a better, more powerful jab than Wlad's.
     
  8. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Very good post, you saved me a lot of typing.
     
  9. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005

    Hard to say, but I have yet to find anyone (and we've had many threads on this) who can make a round by round tabulation of that second fight and give the nod to Holyfield. As far as I'm concerned they fought a total of 24 rounds and Lewis won about 17 of them. It's also hard to know with any certainty whether or not the scoring in the first fight, affected Lewis's strategy in the second one. Either way I scored the fight 8-4 for Lewis and if I give Holyfield the benefit of the doubt in every close round I still only get 7-5 Lewis. So no way no how did Holyfield win that second fight.

    Prime for prime's a hard call. Either Lewis's style holds up and he wins a decision, or Holyfield outworks him and wins a decision.
     
  10. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Oh for God's sake.:patsch:-(
     
  11. Murali

    Murali Member Full Member

    276
    1
    May 1, 2009
    Interesting thread this one. I'm not sure entirely sure how it would go prime against prime.

    For me prime Holyfield - he had an erratic career - was the Holyfield that beat Tyson twice, not the one that beat Bowe. And a prime Wlad is the one of his most recent fights.

    I favour Holyfield slightly to come out on top and win a decision. Sharp, leaping counters and a high workrate would be the order of the day. Plus the ability to absorb a lot of punishment on Holyfield's part. Evander by UD - much as I dislike the guy...
     
  12. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005

    Who the hell can hate (or even dislike) a prime Holyfield? The guy was a warrior in every sense of the word.
     
  13. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Good fight... I would probably bet on Holy. He would get in there sooner or later.
     
  14. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    Holy the best chin and heart in history vs no chin....no heart..........i say holyfield gets into a rythm late in the fight and stops wlad..........ala purritty
     
  15. wvucheerjr

    wvucheerjr Active Member Full Member

    985
    0
    Dec 28, 2008
    I agree with the chin, if a prime Lewis could not KO or even knock down a past it Holyfield he definitely wouldn't knock down a prime Evander. And a prime Evander would heart his way through the jab and outwork Lennox.