Cotto "Im not impressed by Manny last fights"

I wasn't talking about the delahoya fight. Im referring to pac beating barrera in 2003 when barrera was 29 yrs old and # 3 p4p. He fought marquez and was robbed.

Uliuli keeps complaining about pacquaio only fight old fighter and past prime when delahoya did the same ****. Whitaker-past prime - chavez was past his prime- camacho was past his prime.

That's the same **** pac haters always bring up when it comes to barrera-morales and marquez. They're past prime etc etc

 

op

 

Oscar was bigger and younger tha WHitaker and Chaves.

 

My hero? You don't even know who my hero is. But since you only follow Pac and not boxing I don't expect you to know the following. JMM had to fight B level fighters because he was the most avoided man around his division. But once he got the respect and recognition he deserved he gunned for the BEST in Pac, Casa, Juan Diaz and now Mayweather. All while your boy continued fighting HAS BEENS. Shot DLH, exposed Hatton, Shot Morales, Past Prime B level Larios, B level Solis, Fashan, sorry ass Diaz who couldn't even beat a shot Morales, all these even after all his exposure and fame and ability to PICK who he wants to fight.

Camacho, Whitaker and Chavez are WAY better fighters than Barrera, Morales, and Hatton!!! That is without a doubt and there is NO ARGUMENT that that's a fact! Even though they were past prime, they were still A LOT BETTER than the version of Morales, DLH, and Barrera that Pac fought, and a HELL OF ALOT BETTER than David Diaz and Hatton. Take that to school buddy! That is REALITY!

Spot on brother! :good

 

yep funny how pac haters like uliuli always brings up pacman fighting past prime boxers when delahoya did the same thing against Chavez Sr- Whitaker and Camacho:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Will *******S ever LEARN that age does not always equate to prime???!!!!

*******s! atsch

 

they're past prime is all that matters like your favorite excuse when it comes to pacman. Chavez-Whitaker-Camacho were past their prime by the time delahoya fought them:rofl:rofl

 

Man you got PWNED with that post and that's all you got??? Atleast bowdown :hail, or admitt defeat. :-(

 

very good point.

 

post #110 baby.

 

owned:rofl:rofl:rofl like your favorite excuse when it comes to pacman. He only beat old or past prime. Delahoya beat whitaker-chavez and camacho when they were past their prime. I dont have to say anything more cuz i already made my point.

You claimed pacman fight old and past prime fighter when your hero delahoya did the same exact thing. Whitaker-Chavez and camacho are past their prime by the time oscar fought them.

It's not oscar fault cuz his younger just like it's not pacquiao fault that by the time he fought barrera-morales-marquez they were not their best. :rofl:rofl although all were younger than the 3 delahoya fought. :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Cotto seems to think 145 is fair. Hope the haters catch on. Even though I would have liked to see it at 147. People are acting like the guy moving up has no disadvantage whatsoever, only the guy coming down 1 POUND! (he was 146 for Clottey). That's a big joke.

 

Owned. And Vargas' "punch resistance" was not the same after the Tito fight (like Hatton after Floyd right?). Same with Mayorga. Oh and he really lost to Ike and Pea and Sturm.

I'm just emulating him.

This is exactly why UliUli is a joke. Even if he parrots some good points from other people, he clearly hates Pac cause he scrutinizes his resume like crazy but for other fighters he doesn' want to hear it.

 

yeah that is right, people always say that cotto in a disadvantage more but he is still gonna be the bigger and stronger guy in the ring, so i hope people give both of them credit for making this fight.. isnt giving us these exciting fights better than not getting any at all

 

Fair play by Miguel Cotto... He's not impressed by Manny last fights but he also considered Manny as one of the greatest boxers...

link --> Cotto: PAC one of the greatest boxers