explane please. If it was a 7-5 fight it would be close. If it was a 9-3 fight it would be a blow out.
I would call it a clear win. It's hard to just say because let's say Fighter A definitely won 6 rounds and fighter B definitely won 4. But the next 2 were close but everyone gave them to fighter A with the exception of a few people. You're better off giving a certain fight as a example then just asking for 116-112 you know?
It is not that simple. It depends on how the rounds go. For example I had Pavlik/Taylor II 116-112, but every single one of the first 10 rounds was close. I had Calzaghe/Kessler 116-112, and did not think it was a close fight.
8-4 is not what I think of as "blow-out" but, it's not always close either. I had Mayweather-Judah 8-4, but Judah's rounds were close, while Mayweather's were not. Mayweather won his rounds by much wide margins and dominated the middle portion of the fight (rounds 5-10). While other fights can be 8-4 but much closer rounds and close as a whole. I wouldn't argue against scoring Jones-Tarver I 8-4 in favor of Roy (I had it 7-5), but that fight was definitely closer than Mayweather-Judah. Same with Mosley-De La Hoya I, or Cotto-Mosley.
Depends. People could have reasonably scored Calzaghe-Kessler 8-4, but that was a blowout in my book. Same for Mayweather-De La Hoya. Opposite is true for Cotto-Mosley. If someone completely outclasses the other fighter but only wins 8-4 because they took some rounds off and played it safe, that's still a blowout in my book.