De La Hoya vs Pacquiao who wins Legacy wise?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, Jun 24, 2009.


  1. vorapsak2002

    vorapsak2002 Active Member Full Member

    1,196
    1
    Apr 14, 2009

    agree :good
     
  2. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Gold medal winner, 6 div champ, probably the best resume in the last 20 yrs and none of that was accomplished based on his boxing ability:think

    Did you only catch the tail-end of DLH's career?:huh
     
  3. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    lol, of course you are mexican and you would say oscar. :nut
     
  4. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    and you must be English:lol:
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so you must be an unbiased observer here like the threadstarter. :good
     
  6. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    I wasn't the one calling the kettle black Mr. Pot!:lol:
     
  7. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    I like how people criticize Pac for beating older oponents. I remember Oscars early career. I also remember the string of fights that brought him to stardom, a 34 year old Julio César Chávez, a 33 year old Whittiker, and a 35 year old Camacho.
     
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    the problem here is i did'nt even made a comment about who is greater legacy wise. you on the other hand had stated your case already. i just want to know what are the opinions of non-mexicans and pinoys.
     
  9. Pound4poundx

    Pound4poundx Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    De La Hoya is more of a legend in terms of star status. He replaced Mike Tyson as the mainstream superstar of Boxing. Pacuiao is huge but will probably never reach De La Hoya's hollywood appeal in North America. That said, in terms of victories, Pacquiao hasn't been around quite long enough to superced Oscar's accomplishments although that may soon change.
     
  10. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    DLH easily, he fought great fighters in their prime.
     
  11. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    I didn't call you on your opinion, I called you on your hypocrisy:

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^:deal

    And just for the hell of it, what is your answer to the thread question:lol:
     
  12. brood3

    brood3 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,050
    0
    Feb 5, 2009
    Barrera, Morales, and Marquez aren't tough? I love it when people try to discredit great fighters. It makes them look stupid.

    Hey if Pac was pampered and protected like Oscar was he wouldn't have losses on his early career either. So your point is moot. Early careers don't mean **** in boxing anyway.

    Fact of the matter is Pacquiao beat his toughest opponents. Oscar didn't end of story.
     
  13. papolamuerte

    papolamuerte Yo soy La Muerte! Full Member

    3,257
    5
    Apr 21, 2008
    Oscar hands down..:good

    But he lost to Tito aight so dont get it twisted mamon! :nono



    PS...Someone needs to pump up UliUli's most famous thread about the Oscar vs Pac fight please, I feel like having a laugh......:D
     
  14. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009

    Chill out '****, I never said MAB, Morales and Marquez weren't tough.

    Try reading the post again, but this time try it with your head out of your ass:deal















    "early careers don't mean **** in boxing anyway"

    some of you are too much:lol:
     
  15. Critic

    Critic Limited Edition Full Member

    3,612
    3
    Nov 30, 2008
    pacquiao all the way!