Ali vs Wlad/Lewis/Vitali... how does he win?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PugilisticPower, Jun 24, 2009.


  1. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Wlad's only good against stationary targets, who refuse to throw back or just wing punches anyone could move the hell out of the way of, something Iggy and Chagaev did alot of.

    Ali would win the fight in the late rounds, unlike other fighters he has faced in the past, Ali will force him to chase him and miss alot. The fact that Wlad is 6'6 and a half 240-250will work against him in this fight, seeing that Wlad's stamina is already a weakness of his, along with his weak chin and lack of mental toughness when things get rough, as we seen when he faced guys like Brewster, Sanders, Peter.

    Ali will win this fight, he's mentally tougher, better footmovement, superior handspeed, 10 times better chin, and more ring generalship. Wlad's size will work against him in this fight, and if this a 15 rounder I would bet everything I got Ali causes Wlad to have another Brewster like moment in the championship rounds.
     
  2. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    Agree that Ali of Lyle would not beat Wlad. Infact, any version of Ali after 1972ish - possibly exclusing the Zaire version - would arguably lose to Wlad [at his best]. But both at their respective bests, Ali in a competitive, but very clear decision over 12. Stoppage over 15, Wlad has awful stamina.
     
  3. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Wlad doesn't chase fighters. God, you've got people who are completely basing their stuff and predictions out of a semblance of no reality, what so ever in here.

    Suddenly, Wlad has changed from being the guy everyone think is boring because he's clinical, doesn't chase fighters and uses his height advantage with a jab to ensure he dominates the fights - to someone who is going to chase Ali around all night and throw wide punches that Ali can slip inside.

    Notice how no one ever takes a logical viewpoint of this fight? No one ever looks at the actual facts.

    Wlad of today - 199cm, Reach 206cm, Fight weight of 240lb.
    Fight Style: Uses his reach to his advantage with a good textbook jab and footwork that keeps him on the outside, is cautious but clinical and sets up his opponent for the right straight with his jab.

    Ali of 74 - 191cm, Reach, 203cm, Fight Weight, 215ishlbs.
    Fight Style: Although not as fluid as his youth, still a fighter who uses footwork and cunning to distance himself from his opponent to snap the jab, as well as a decent left hook. Generally was the taller and faster opponent in the ring, when he wasn't and was up against good fighters in Norton and Foreman, he struggled to dominate proceedings.

    Let's not magically make Ali have a killer uppercut that he never threw, nor a shoulder roll defense on the inside that meant he could slip punches and setup his punches.

    Let's not magically make Wlad into a slow moving, come forward, Valuev style plunder fighter.

    Judge the fight on the merits. Ali giving up 8cm of height and 3cm of reach effectively gave him a disadvantage of around 10cm for his jab vs Wlad... lets not believe that Ali can move in and out effectively against those odds in the way he did with smaller MUCH smaller fighters.
     
  4. Gezabahai

    Gezabahai Member Full Member

    270
    0
    Sep 8, 2007
    Joe Louis, Rocky Marciano, Ali, Dempsey, these are boxers that rose above the sport or defined a generation. This is as much a part of their legacy as their skill or ring accomplishments. Conversely, Larry Holmes, and now Wladimir Klitschko (at least not yet in the USA) didn't become larger than life and their prowess was not given a boost by other considerations that they represented. This eternal discussion of who would beat who is sustained more by nostalgia and championing a generation than the relative merits of individual athletes.
     
  5. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    lyle had never been stopped up untill the point ali stopped him.....young was coming off a draw against shavers, when ali beat him in a solid UD......

    Its ridiculous to think.....that ali couldnt KO wlad......if guys with **** skills like brewster and sanders did it......why can't ali.....just ridiculous....
     
  6. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Wlad doesn't have to chase anyone because most of his oppenents are fat stationary targets, or just freeze up under pressure. Rahman, Austin, Brewster 1 and 2, Bryd 2, Iggy, Chagaev, all stood on the outside and let Wlad sniper away on them. Noone Wlad fought had anytype of footmovement, Bryd 1 had some, but nothing like the 67 version of Ali had.

    Wlad only looks good because he's facing weak competition, that would be like putting Lebron now in a highschool basketball game, of course he's going to dominate he's physically superior to his oppostion and bigger and stronger and more skilled than anyone else. Ali on the other hand is superior to Wlad in many of the categories I already named. All Wlad's got over Ali is power, and the fact that he's physically stronger, everything else would be in Ali's favor.
     
  7. Caliboxing

    Caliboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,203
    4,556
    Sep 28, 2007
    I guess the 3 inch height advantage makes it impossible for Ali to beat Wlad even though their reach is practically the same. Fast combination punching, lateral movement, stamina, and heart don't mean anything anymore because todays heavyweights are so big. Wlad TKO5 Ali.:patsch
     
  8. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    :rofl

    I stopped here. I can't read this tripe. Wlad fights stationary targets, he can afford to "box". But Ali only fights on the front foot when he senses a KO. He always made his opponent come forward, except against Jimmy Young, who is the most defensive-minded heavyweight you'll see. And the only reason he could afford to fight going backwards was because the 70s Ali was far more stationary. Ali would be circling Wlad from the beginning. Wlad would be forced to fight on the front foot, because you can't fight backing up against someone up on their toes who is circling, moving out of range.

    I can't believe you actually combined the height and reach discrepancy to come up with the jabbing difference. Jabbing up might slightly reduce the power of the jab, but the range won't change. Do something for me... put your fist against a wall, with a straight arm. Then move it down 3 inches, and then back to normal, then up 3 inches. What do you notice? Both up and down have reduced range. Wlad has a tiny advantage in reach, it's almost negligable. But when Ali is bouncing in and out of range at the speed he did, reach won't matter.
     
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Klitschko’s _style_ could be impregnable, according to Emanuel Steward, who says, “For the first time I’ve ever had a heavyweight that I could always see weaknesses when I would train a guy to beat if I was ever in the other corner. Wladimir is gonna be the one I don’t think I could train no man to beat the way he is. I’m serious. I’ve never had a fighter – I went from Holyfield and all the guys I’ve worked with, never, Lennox – (Wladimir) is a very, very committed, very difficult to beat fighter. Because he won’t let you fight him. He makes you fight what he wants you to fight. But the biggest thing which I think people are not looking at is his speed for a big man. Tremendous speed.”
     
  10. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    I hear ya, size is everything to some of these idiots. I been in the ring with big and small oppenents and you know what I learned, there strengths to being the smaller man as well as weaknesses and vice versa. When your bigger you start to labor in the ring quicker than your smaller oppenent, your body tends to be more exposed, your balance/center of gravity is usually worse. All of which we seen Wlad have problems with in the past. Brewster found a ton of openenings to Wlad's body in their first fight, so much so RJJ commented that Wlad must have a strong body, but a weak chin. Wlad also showed that he tires quickly, hence the reason Emanual has him pacing himself now, because against both Brewster and Purrity he punched himself out. And finally, Wlad's center gravity is terrible, which is the reason why he looks so awkward alot of times when his oppenents are throwing punches at him. Peter had him falling all over the place and so did TOS.

    Wlad's size is just as much a weakness as it is a strength, though with the help of Steward, he is able to mask his weaknesses alot better.
     
  11. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    A good big man always beats a good small man. Vlad is fast, he fantastic boxing technique. Let's face it, he is fantastic and is beating all the hater's heroes.
     
  12. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Of course Stewards going to say Wlad's the best he's ever trained, he's the one thats training him and Wlad's the one sending him a paycheck at the end of the day.

    Just like I'm sure your girlfriend tells you your the best she ever had in bed because she's currently with you. It wont be until after you break up will know the truth.:deal
     
  13. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    And idiots continue to completely disregard everything that has been said, the same idiots that likely feel like Floyd has a limited chance against Williams because of his size and reach advantages, despite on a comparitive level, Floyd being a much more complete inside counter punching boxer than Ali.

    It's NOT just about size. It's about the fact that Ali USED his size in his fights, he USED his reach advantage and that combined with his speed is what made him a gifted fighter. He was never a KO artist and that shows in the majority of his fights, he has a comparitively low KO percentage when compared to most HW's.

    Also the other thing to note, Ali didn't face the range of opposition in his prime, that combining with nostalgia and the fact that he was light years ahead of limited fighters like Liston and Patterson makes people think that was his prime and somehow he completely lost that in 2-3 years, despite him still being in his early 30s, an age that most men are in their physical prime.

    Could it be that the competition got better and therefore he looked less dominant? You all claim that Wlad's dominance over fighters is because they're ****, yet Ali's early dominance was against greats? No, the greats came after his time out from the sport.

    Ali could NOT distance himself from Wlad and use the jab to the same effect he did against the Fraziers and Listons, that is why the size difference matters.

    Combine that to the fact that the fighters that gave Ali the most problems, even in his younger years, were the big guys like Norton and Foreman - who negated the reach advantage.

    Then combine that to the fact that Wlad is a much more technically complete and faster boxer than any of the guys above 6'3 that Ali faced.

    You'll see why Steward rates him so highly and thinks he's near unbeatable. When a guy carries this sort of size advantage over people while having being able to produce a skillset suited to that size, they're tough to beat.

    It's why Williams vs Floyd intrigues people - can the little man beat the big man, only in the case of Floyd, he has all the skills he needs - shoulder roll, ability to get inside, tight counter punching, good inside fighting skills.

    Ali NEVER displayed inside fighting skills and suddenly he's going to in this fight? People are too precious about their nostalgia.

    74' Foreman has a much better opportunity against Wlad, Lewis and Vitali than 67' or 74' Ali does, solely because his style relies on his power and ability to take a shot - not his ability to out distance and jab his opponent.
     
  14. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Ali was taller than most of his opponents. Quarry 5 feet 10 inches tall for an example. Five inches taller!
     
  15. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    And when he wasn't taller, they were fighters like Terrell - devoid of skill and agility, slow moving punching bags.

    Norton was the first guy of size he faced that had a decent skillset and we saw the struggles he had with Norton.

    Foreman showed what a bigger, stronger man could do to Ali... only 74' Foreman lacks a brain and a gameplan, punched himself stone cold out and Ali capitalised.

    "Why did crude fighters like Sanders, Brewster and Purrity beat Wlad" - 6 years ago, when he wasn't half the fighter he is now... also, Brewster and Sanders huge punchers and inside fighters. Something Ali cannot lay claim too.

    Wlad is bigger than any fighter Ali has ever faced in terms of pounds and height, he's also one of the most complete textbook fighters Ali would have faced and despite his size, his speed is comparative to any fighter Ali faced.