Roach wants to silence Pacquiao’s critics

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Critic, Jun 28, 2009.

  1. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    31,396
    Likes Received:
    3
    As long as the fight is at 147, you won't hear a peep from me. As long as the fight is at a catch weight, I'm going to voice my opinion even if Cotto agrees to 145 *******s.
     
  2. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    31,396
    Likes Received:
    3
    Roach hears the criticism. Real boxing fans are turned off seeing Pac fight inferior comp, and past it guys. Now Roach says he has no interest in Shane because he is old, and that a fight with a prime Cotto should do the trick as far a silencing Pac's critics lol...:lol::lol::lol:
     
  3. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    44,390
    Likes Received:
    6
    Roach is honestly a ****ing Hypocrite, he is tired of the excuses? Hmm What he needs to do is take a look at his post pressers from the first Marquez and Morales fights before he starts to talk ****.
    under circumstances that favored Manny even when Manny was defeated Roach came up with some good excuses Manny threw a few in there right along with him, such as his blisters or then you have the winnings gloves and the head but etc...
     
  4. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    i never heard cotto had been struggling to make 147 lbs WW limit, cotto counter demanded pacquiao's 143 lbs with 145 lbs that's why everybody except dumb haters believe that he's not draining himself at 145 lbs catchweight, basically it's his term after all..

    so voice your opinion all you want, it doesn't matter because you're just a lowlife hater who always ***** of your boy valero whose never defeated any worthy oponent except bums and cub drivers..
     
  5. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    31,396
    Likes Received:
    3
    This is why I don't, and will never respect you as a poster. My last response to you ******* lol...
     
  6. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    31,396
    Likes Received:
    3
    :good:good:good
     
  7. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    do you think i respect you as a poster since the first time i read your post?.ulol
     
  8. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let's get this clear, regardless of weight, age or stamina the reason why DLH lost to Pac was because of Pacs SPEED.

    And I'll back this up with evidence:
    When DLH corner threw in the towel they said 'There's no point continuing...HE'S TOO FAST!'

    Basically Pac would have beaten any version of DLH as Pac was bringing the speed of a guy from much lower weight divisions. Pac was beating DLH to the punch everytime. In the end DLH just stopped throwing punches.
     
  9. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why the f*ck should the fight be at 147. Pac's best weight is at 140. Why the F*CK SHOULD HE GO UP TO 147! You're wingeing about Cotto losing 2 pounds.

    Why should the number one P4P in the world change weight to meet his CHALLENGER! Cotto should be bending over backward to meet Pac's demands. Just as if Cotto was P4P number he would expect his challenger to meet HIS demands.